Film companies demand names of Reddit users who discussed piracy in 2011
Film companies demand names of Reddit users who discussed piracy in 2011
arstechnica.com
Film companies demand names of Reddit users who discussed piracy in 2011
159 comments
-
The MPAA really is grasping for straws aren't they. Ever since people were able to stream movies during the pandemic and found it was a much cheaper more enjoyable experience, they have been trying to invent ways to drive people back to the theaters. Now they are suffering major block buster busts and they have to point the finger at someone so they think, "it's those darn Reddit pirates!" Its funny that they don't realize they caused their own demise. But really I wonder, why specifically 2011?
-
2011 is well outside the Statute of Limitations for infringement...
That's three years with some wiggle room for ongoing infringement.
This is likely an intimidation/shakedown thing.
-
Sounds more like they’re going after Grande. Belief being the testimony would allow them to build a case that Grande incited or somehow induced privacy which would strip them from a number of legal protections that may apply to service providers.
-
Could be that they're looking to block similar usernames in their streaming services?
-
-
Right? Yeah, piracy is the reason people don’t go to the movies. It has nothing to do with the overpriced, nasty concessions (cold, overly salty popcorn), dirty floors, uncomfortable “reclining” seats, gimmicks (4DX, RPX, XD), staff that can’t be bothered to turn off the lights at showtime or properly configure the sound systems. All while you’re paying $15 per ticket and $30 on snacks.
These morons live in an entirely different world.
-
Not to mention the comparison between watching a movie at home, where you know it will be silent, versus the risk of having at least one (but often more) groups of people who will not shut the fuck up the whole time.
-
Can also pause, rewind, fast forward, lie down, and more at home
-
Definitely gotta do more at home 😎👀
-
Hey babe want to movie theater and chill?
-
Arrr I see booty aboard me couch
-
-
-
-
-
It's funny because we subscribe to the AMC A-List and go to the movies quite a bit (obviously this is in the US). But it's because a) we have a couple of AMC theatres close by, and b) it's just me and my spouse, no kids involved. So it's something that to us is worthwhile (having a night out a few times a months to see a movie on the big screen). Also, we never buy concessions. I can't imagine how an average family with a bunch of kids can just go and drop over 100 bucks on tickets and concessions on any given night.
-
The gap between reality and what corporate shills who probably don't even use their own product think is reality is ever widening.
-
I think they are short staffed aka underpaid.
-
Agreed. That means that the current business model for movie theaters is unsustainable.
-
Yup. Where I'm at two tickets and two popcorn will be 60$...sixty fucking dollars, that's a lot of fucking money to sit in some shitty seats listening to other people eat and slurp.
-
-
-
It has nothing to do with the overpriced, nasty concessions (cold, overly salty popcorn), dirty floors
Ugh, this just reminds me of all those times I went to the theater, and no matter where I walked I would hear the squish sound from my shoes coming into contact with something sticky... I do not miss that at all.
-
-
Disagree that it's more enjoyable than going to the theaters. There is a social aspect of going to movies with friend groups that's hard to replicate at home. People don't have space to fit 12 friends to comfortably watch a new release.
-
159 comments