Jill Stein delivers scathing response to Harris-Trump debate and urges Green alternative
Jill Stein delivers scathing response to Harris-Trump debate and urges Green alternative
You're viewing a single thread.
198 Posts
1.24K Comments
Joined 1 month
Source: https://lemmy.ml/u/UniversalMonk@lemmy.world
If it took only 10 seconds to post each time, and 20 seconds to make a comment, that means you have spent:
(198 * 10) + (1240 * 20) = 26780 secondsOr, 7.44 hours, in one month. That's almost 5% the amount of time people spend working full time. Almost a full work day. And these are extremely generous estimates that assume you are very fast. I have no doubt you have spent minutes responding to some of the comments calling you out.
A more realistic set of numbers would be
(198 * 30) + (1240 * 45) = 61740 secondsOr, 17.15 hours, in one month. That's almost 43% the amount of time people spend working full time. Over 2 full work days.
To calculate the number of times you submitted content per waking hour:
(198 + 1240) / (16 * 30) = 3Or once every 20 minutes on average, assuming you sleep. Almost every single one promoting third party candidates. Totally and completely not sus, at all. Not even a little bit.
I don't have to explain anything to you. But keep posting stats because I am posting more articles. Thank you!
Of course. You would only explain why you post three times per hour
- in favor of third party candidates
- suddenly, starting 3 months before the election
- increasing in frequency after the debate
- despite the massive amount of critical comments you get
If the explanation would not get you permabanned.
I don't have to explain anything to you. Thanks!
But the fact is that if there were a legit reason, you would.
No one owes you an explanation for anything, You're demanding an explanation for someone else's actions the same way that Democrats demand votes from everyone. They're not entitled and you were not entitled.
I am a Dem and I'd really love that all citizens people vote. Be good if they took an active interest in our democracy. Your statement isn't entirely wrong it's just not entirely correct.
Not entirely wrong and not entirely correct makes perfect sense for someone with a hammer a sickle next to their username.
You saying I got some flare next to my handle!? Hell yeah! Can't see it on my lemmy client. Oh, you mean OP.
Ah look another simp
Removed, civility.
Thank you!
Nope. I don't have to explain anything to you. Stay as mad as you want. Under this username or your various other ones. But I owe you nothing. :)
You apparently are pretty confused. "you have to" and "you would" are extremely different phrases, and I never once implied they were similar. Only that you wouldn't need to pretend "the articles are interesting" is your motivation, in a context which implicates you as sketch af, if you weren't sketch af.
You'd simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are. I guess it's possible you're a masochist who likes being insulted, but I think the other explanation is much more likely ;)
You’d simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are.
I don't care if "thousands" of people are telling me how "horrible" I am. I can post what I want as long as it fits the community guidelines. And I will continue to do so.
And I don't have to explain anything to you. Thank you!
I don’t have to explain anything to you
Again, no one said you had to. But you would, if there weren't something insidious behind this bizarre behavior.