I’m gonna hold the politicians that lied to progress their career, the pundits that argued in bad faith, the clergy that put their faith aside for their political agenda, the people that sought to hide history instead of teaching it, those that worked hard to dehumanize those they disagree with, the leaders that opted for violence as a way to garner support, and I’m sure others, as responsible also.
Hmm. Well, not disagreeing, but, from your perspective, what should Garland have done that he failed to do? (And under which position - as he never made it to the SC and thus couldn't have voted down any of the things that happened there).