Morocco (Al Maghrib), or more officially the Kingdom of Morocco (Al Mamlaka al Maghribiya), is a country located in the northwestern edge of the African continent. The name Morocco comes from the Spanish name Marruecos, which itself comes from the name of the city of Marrakesh. In Turkish for example, Morocco is known as Fas, mainly because Turks knew the land of Morocco through the city of Fes. Morocco is regarded as part of the Arab World and Arabic is the main language amongst the population, with French and Berber languages also widely spoken in the country.
Morocco was the home of mostly Berber tribes until the Muslim conquest and the subsequent Arab migrations in the 700s under the Umayyads drastically changed the character of the country. A Berber commander, Tariq ibn Ziyad, would later cross the Strait of Gibraltar (Jabal Tariq) from the northern shores of now-Morocco and conquer Andalusia, which remained under Muslim rule for nearly 800 years. The country emerged as a significant regional power during the Almoravid and Almohad dynasties in the medieval period, known for their contributions to architecture, philosophy, and trade across North Africa and southern Europe. The current ruling dynasty of Morocco, the Alaouite dynasty, came to power in the late 1600s. The Alaouites claim descent from the Prophet Muhammad through his grandson Hasan ibn Ali, giving them religious legitimacy and political authority in the region. Despite the Shia-coded claim to legitimacy, the Moroccan royal family and the population mostly follow the Maliki school of Sunni Islam.
In the early 20th century, the Treaty of Fez (1912) created the French Protectorate of Morocco, negotiated largely without input from the Moroccan people. Moroccan lands were completely divided under French and Spanish zones, with thousands of colonists pouring into the country. The royal family frequently collaborated with colonial powers, suppressing local resistance movements and prioritizing European interests. Prominent anti-colonial uprisings, like the Rif War (1921–1926), were met with brutal crackdowns, enabled by Western-backed forces. Post-independence in 1956, Morocco maintained close ties with its former colonizers, fostering economic dependence on France and Spain. The monarchy’s alignment with Western geopolitical interests often undermined Pan-African and Arab unity movements.
During the Cold War, Morocco positioned itself as a staunch ally of the West, marginalizing leftist and nationalist factions within the country. The Green March of 1975 was a Moroccan state-organized movement to assert control over Western Sahara, a territory decolonized from Spanish rule but still awaiting self-determination. This march, supported by Western powers, particularly the United States, is often criticized as a colonial expansion disguised as a popular movement. By settling Moroccans in the disputed territory, the march disregarded the Sahrawi people's right to sovereignty. U.N. resolutions on Western Sahara have seen limited enforcement, largely due to Morocco’s Western alliances shielding it from accountability. Western-backed security and intelligence partnerships continue to be the cornerstone of Morocco’s repressive nature towards any anti-colonial and leftist movements. In 2021, Algeria again severed diplomatic ties with Morocco, citing hostile actions and concerns over Morocco's ties with Israel, which Algeria views as a betrayal of pro-Palestinian solidarity. The two countries have mostly clashed over the issue of Western Sahara other than a short war in the 60s over a border dispute, with Algeria continuing to support the Sahrawi independence movement.
Morocco's relations with Israel have historically been discreet but significant, rooted in the presence of a large Moroccan Jewish diaspora in Israel. Former King Hassan II played a significant behind-the-scenes role in fostering covert ties between Morocco and Israel during his reign. King Hassan II is reported to have allowed Israeli intelligence access to critical information from a meeting of Arab leaders in Casablanca in 1965, which may have helped Israel prepare for the Six-Day War in 1967. His government provided a platform for discreet diplomatic exchanges and intelligence-sharing, including Morocco’s facilitation of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat’s visit to Israel in the 1970s. In 2020, Morocco formally normalized ties with Israel through the Abraham Accords, brokered by the United States, in exchange for U.S. and Israeli recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara. Diplomatic and trade relations have since deepened, with agreements in fields like defence, agriculture, and technology. Despite official ties, Moroccan public opinion remains largely sympathetic to Palestinians, but such opinions are rarely considered by the royal family.
Morocco's future is split between ambitious global aspirations and permanent domestic issues. The country’s co-hosting of the 2030 FIFA World Cup with Spain and Portugal is seen as a significant opportunity to showcase its shiny infrastructure and global presence. However, these achievements are often overshadowed by criticisms of its political culture, including the monarchy's ceremonial practices, such as the humiliating tradition of publicly kissing the crown prince's hand. Allegations surrounding King Mohammed VI's personal behavior, including incidents of public drunkenness and alleged homosexuality continue to be a hot topic within opposition circles.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis. Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
The situation in Syria is really bad. Suriyakmaps, a very reliable war mapper that relies only on geolocated evidence, has called the collapse of Syrian Army positions in the west of Aleppo. Videos and photographs are emerging of HTS fighters in the governors mansion and police headquarters in Aleppo, further inside the city, falling back or dispersing into the city afterwards. A third front has been opened in Idlib, where Russian aviation allegedly cannot operate freely due to the presence of Surface to Air Missiles, though this is not confirmed. It's looking bleak, Aleppo could fall to HTS within the next few days. If they take the Citadel of Aleppo to the northeast, it's over.
New videos have emerged of HTS fighters on the outskirts of the Citadel, if not at the Citadel itself. Covert insurgents behind the front lines that have blended into the city. Rooting these HTS insurgents out with counterinsurgency operations is going to be very difficult. That is, if there's even time for counterinsurgency operations before the entire city falls.
Yeah, it's insurgents going behind the frontlines taking pictures, then either retreating or blending in with the civilian population. Pro Assad civilians or Syrian army troops then take photos at the same location(s) afterwards, when HTS insurgents are gone. The frontlines are still very much in the western part of the city and not the northeast, as per Suriyakmaps' lastest post. But the current rate of advance by HTS is very worrying. They went from 10km away from the western outskirts of Aleppo, to controlling that within 3 days. Unless reinforcements come in fast and push them back, it's bleak. Counterinsurgency operations are also going to be a massive pain, but that's if the city can be held first.
It's only getting worse as more and more news comes out. Al-Qaeda affiliates are on the verge of taking control of Aleppo, a city with a population of over 2 million people. It's a complete disaster. The Turkish, and once USA backed SNA/FSA (the so called"moderate rebels" in most western media) are also launching offensives against the Syrian army in Tadif. They were expected to launch an offensive against the SDF first, but that did not materialise.
Is there any chance of the Syrian army even coming back from this? I was a child back when the war first started and the battle of aleppo took place so I don't know or remember how dire it was, is it similar in any way? Or is it over and Syria might as well fall to israel-western control?
If Aleppo falls, it going to take lots of intense fighting over a long period of time to take it back. I suspect this is all being done/instigated by USA/NATO (using Turkey and their unofficial member in Israel to directly assist the insurgents) to force Russia into a two front war and divert resources to Syria, to prop the government up. And to prevent Hezbollah from re-arming through Syria.
Figured that much, thanks for the rundown. I just pray and hope my cousins will be safe, I don't want Syria to fall but it's getting harder not to go doomer mode at this rate. Fuck these terrorist scumbags to hell and back.
They are literally Al-Qaeda, I have no idea how these terrorist groups have any support from ordinary people, in the West especially. You can go on their leader's Wikipedia page and even they admit he was part of Al-Qaeda, Al Nusra and ISI.
Apologies in advance if I'm being annoying, I'm just trying to get a better grasp on the situation but if Aleppo were to fall (which it seems it will as nightmarish as that scenario is) what are the odds it could be taken back? I know it would take a long time and would be a brutal battle but is there a likely or even sliver of chance the rebels could take it permanently for lack of better word? Have the Syrian armed forces ever been taken by surprise this badly due to the corruption and disorganization we're seeing now (though I'm aware, according to suryakmaps, that there's now some purges happening) and manage to come back from it? Does Aleppo falling mean that in it's current state that Syria could also fall in the coming years? Again sorry for the rambling I'm just mind-scrambled atp.
Have the Syrian armed forces ever been taken by surprise this badly due to the corruption and disorganization we're seeing now.
Yes, that's why Russia had to intervene in the first place in September 2015. The Assad government only controlled a quarter of Syrian territory back then.
Some bases have been overrun in the western areas, yes, with troops abandoning their equipment, including T-72 tanks and MANPADS. A lot of the photos of HTS fighters in the northeast of Aleppo, are from insurgents that have infiltrated behind the frontlines. But it's not looking good.