Is it really that big of a deal? I just upgraded to a 9900x and am playing Yakuza kiwami 2 and several vr games including half life alyx at max settings. On the rare occasion I drop below 120fps, the bottleneck has very clearly been my 6700xt. I don't think I've seen the cpu ever come close to maxing out
Nah like unless your game is a cpu intensive game (older games come into mind) any recent cpu will do just fine. Hell even a 5600 still chugs for 99% of all games
Cache is just a slight optimization and your gpu matters a lot more for gaming. The only other benefit is a bit better power draw, which is like nothing in the grand scheme of things.
I don’t think I’ve seen the cpu ever come close to maxing out
You bought a Camaro for an hour long daily commute stuck in traffic.
It's not going to be bad, it's just if all you do is game then you're not using what you paid for. You could be getting the same performance for much less price and electricity.
Gaming performance might be a little worse than an x3d (probably not), but you'd need a crazy card for a cpu bottleneck so it doesn't matter.
You said that buying a CPU like mine, with a slightly smaller cache, was a bad idea specifically for gaming. I'm not clear on why it makes a big difference.
Literally just asking you to explain your own claim of "cache makes a huge difference for gaming," and instead you walk that back, pretend like I said anywhere that ALL I do with it is game, and get sassy on top of that. Smdh
pretend like I said anywhere that ALL I do with it is game,
No, I said no one should buy this for gaming...
No one should buy this for gaming…
You've misunderstood everything I said, and now you're taking an attitude because you don't know what's happening. Which honestly is a very normal reaction, it's just the threshold that's surprising.
Me explaining anything to you is just going to be frustrating on both sides, so I'll take the easy step to make sure it doesn't happen again.