Skip Navigation

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
103 comments
  • @yogthos No need to use strong language, I understand what you're trying to say.

    As a UX dev of over 10 years, UX is important but secondary to safeguards against being toyed with by power-tripping tech bros. That's why I use fedi, that's why I build with ipfs instead of http.

    There's nothing I need so bad that I would give up my digital freedoms.

    • The is a non nonsequitor, because having a single UI framework has little to do with power tripping tech bros.

      • @yogthos I'm not even talking about UI frameworks anymore, but the UX and client-server or distributed models that you'd build with them.

        You can't build a super-app without also creating a massive power imbalance.

        • I completely agree with you. This could be done at the OS level if everybody would agree on a common API. This what I'm trying to explain here, the concept of a unified UX experience is a net positive for the users, and it doesn't need to be implemented as an app. Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water.

103 comments