At this rate, why not.
At this rate, why not.
![](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/aa894930-7b3a-47a6-a582-8a6367f992c0.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
![](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/aa894930-7b3a-47a6-a582-8a6367f992c0.jpeg?format=webp)
At this rate, why not.
You're viewing a single thread.
This is “nuke the hurricane”-level science.
No, absolutely not. This is increasing the surface area and availability of rocks that take up CO2.
By “level”, I’m talking about the practicality and wisdom of the idea.
It is not comparable.