Skip Navigation
Masturbatory Egoism @lemm.ee

Masturbatory Egoism on Elon Musk's X meme media platform. Ryan Shead invokes gender alpha-male USA X language of "you pussies" against government, alpha-male "weakness" of women

Elon Musk X media platform is common venue for masturbation to USA "left vs. right" egoism of tribal alpha-male intercourse

 

“Are you smarter than a 3rd grade school student?” … Masturbatory Egoism of social media simulacra. Reactionary comment messages on social systems that boil down to: “I am smarter than Donald Trump”, “I am smarter than Elon Musk”, “I am smarter than Russia”

26 comments
  • "Pussy" in this context means "scaredy cat"

    • “Pussy” in this context means “scaredy cat”

      In the context of White House / Donald Trump "grab them by the Pussy" year 2025, it means alpha-male shit-talk against men to imply they are cowardly women and girlie girls.

      It's a technique of negging used on Elon Musk's X and other social machine platforms. The USA society (even those too young to legally vote) has adopted Donald Trump as a Reality Social Media star that leads them, populations frequently discuss his mannerisms, repeat his speech style, Fox News speak language, gestures, and are compulsive in adopting his Twitter style / rally performance shows.

      Orlando Area News: President Trump negged Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in batcrap-crazy rally opener last night. Using a power move beloved by PUAs (and familiar to daughters at holiday dinners) everywhere, President Donald Trump pulled the classic insult/compliment neg on Gov. Ron DeSantis in a tidy three words: "He’s not fat."

      • What Americans need more than amything, are Critical Thinking Slills. That's what allows people to reject propagamda instantly. Often, research isn't even necessary, because the basic premise is flawed enough to reject it, if you have the Critical Thinking Slills to analyze it.

        • What Americans need more than amything, are Critical Thinking Slills. That’s what allows people to reject propagamda instantly.

          "Instantly", "reactionary" "without thinking".

          That's exactly the opposite.

          We have known this since the 1950 / 1960's: "A point of view means a static fixed position and you can't have a static fixed position in the electric age. It's impossible to have a point of view in the electric age and have any meaning at all. You've got to be everywhere at once whether you like it or not. You have to be participating in everything going on at the same time and that is not a point of view." — Marshall McLuhan, University of Toronto professor

          This isn't an American only issue. The Middle East has been in crisis for THOUSANDS of years with the same problem that Americans have. The BIble.

          1. People are unable to tell fiction from non-fiction, we need to educate and address that problem. See here: !FictionNonFiction@lemm.ee
          2. People used to go to the public library and look up information in books and fact-check. That is how you distinguish fiction from non fiction.
          3. People in year 2025, all over the world, avoid Wikipedia and fact-checking. What they trust is Social Media machines of anonymous no-name people. They do not even know who the author of Lemmy comments are, they just accept anything they read because they like the decoration of the meme format. That is why things have gotten so terrible since year 2007 in USA. The Apple iPhone.

          You can't have every person watching different TV shows, going to 8,000 different Lemmy communities to get the meme news. People are NOT ON the same page. Instead of all of us building a Super Wikipedia that has every factional citation and reference of information that is common ground / common understanding Super WIkipedia, people get their learning and education from thousands of different Lemmy comments and they filter and subscribe to different Bluesky and YouTube feeds and live in their own ego-driven "this is attractive" information.

          This crisis was spelled out in 1985 in a book by Neil Postman, see !BackTo1985@lemm.ee

          • Everybody "being on the same page" isn't necessarily a good thing. MAGAs are on the same page - Fox News, and the Conservative Propaganda Machine. Christians are on the same page, so are Muslims.

            Rather than everyone rowing in the same direction, it's more important that people know how to find the truth, and differentiate between truth and lies, and it starts with Critical Thinking Skills, which requires people to first apply the "smell" test.

            For instance, in 2016, MAGA made a claim that 3 million illegals were bussed in from Mexico to vote for Hillary Clinton on Election Day, and many people believed it, and repeated it as truth. It didn't require research to prove it wrong, just some common sense Critical Thinking.

            How many people does a bus hold? 50? So to bus in 3 million people would require 60,000 busses. Were border agents aware of 60,000 busses full of undocumented Mexican tourists crossing the border that day? The border crossings are on video. Do the videos show an enormous rise Mexican bus traffic that day? The answer is No.

            What about the polling places? Did any report having busloads of Mexicans pulling up, and piling in to vote? The answer is No.

            And who organized this giant operation? They would have had to register specific people to vote weeks in advance, tying their illegal registry to an actual address. Then they would have to find that same person on Election Day, and make sure they get on the exact right bus, to the exact right polling station on Election Day, and repeat that 3 million times, all on the same day, and not make any mistakes. Does any of that sound plausible, or even possible? The answer is No.

            What about the human requirememts of 3 million people on that day? They would have to feed them, and let them use restrooms. Any reports of 60,000 busses flooding truck stops all over California that day? The answer is No.

            It would have taken an army of people dedicated to pulling off this enormous election fraud in a reliably Blue state that didn't even need the votes. It was an extrely controversial election, and not one person has ever stepped forward to say they participated in it.

            Just a cursory look at the alleged "facts" is enough to reject the idea as preposterous, without any research at all. That's the value of Critical Thinking Skills.

26 comments