The same Ohio river valley where the Wright brothers pioneered human flight will soon manufacture cutting-edge electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft.
Its not an “opinion” but that adding a bunch of these new, experimental craft increases risk, it’s a fact which you continue to ignore while you keep using false equivalencies and straw men while performing mental gymnastics to argue in circles.
The truth is, there is no safety record, establish for these vehicles, because they haven’t been flown like this before. Keep living in your fantasy because that’s all your argument is and nothing you say can change that.
No, you're just giving your opinion. Actually, "fearmongering" is the right term for your posts.
You, like so many others, are afraid of new technology. But the FAA isn't. And if the FAA isn't, then neither am I. Because they are aviation experts, and you aren't.
“Nuh-uh!” isn’t a very good argument, dude. Most people learn this in elementary school. And adding ad hominem attacks to your arsenal of logical fallacies doesn’t really do much to strengthen your position either.
As for the FAA, they dal with risk management, which they believe they can handle,and that’s very different than what you’re claiming, as I’ve said over and over and over. It’s not my fault that you keep ignoring the facts. Your fantasies aren’t going to save you or anyone else when one of these things comes crashing down from the sky, and that will happen. None of your fallacious arguments or schoolyard insults can change that.
"The sky is falling" isn't a very good argument, dude. Most people learn this in elementary school.
The FAA and I claim the same thing. Commercial aviation is safe. All commercial aircraft, of any size, are safer than any other commercial vehicle. The facts are on our side.
You are terrified that commercial aviation will be unsafe in the future. but you have no facts on your side. Merely speculation based on fear of the unknown. People have been afraid of things "crashing from the sky" since the birth of aviation. People were afraid of jets, they were afraid of transatlantic flights, they were afraid of autopilot systems.
Anything new can strike fear into the uneducated.
The FAA doesn't think the future will be less safe, because they have educated themselves with the facts. And I trust the FAA. Their success speaks for itself.
I never said “the sky is failing,” and if you have to lie about what I said and have to keep making stuff up, using one logical fallacy after another, you’ve clearly lost the argument, and you know it.
Clearly you can’t tell the difference between my sarcasm and your outright lie, but I should hardly be surprised that you’d use yet another false equivalence to rationalize your silly fantasy.
You lost this argument losing ago, kid. Go to bed.
You’re the only one here confusing facts and opinion, kid, as you’ve proven over and over and over.
It’s funny how mad you are about it, what with all the logical fallacies, lies, and name-calling. I obviously got under your skin because I don’t believe your fantasy. There’s nothing you can do to change that but getting more and more angry.
You're the one who has spouted lies over and over and confused them with the truth. Did you actually expect anyone to believe your fantasy that commercial aviation is dangerous?
I can't get mad at children, or those of you who act like children. Nothing will change them but experience, and you've still got a long ways to go.
I'm sure you'll sleep well, probably dreaming about how you single-handedly stopped advancements in aviation. Or maybe about how you bravely resisted dangerous new forms of vaccination. You folks are all the same.
Keep dreaming, meanwhile the rest of the world will move on without you.