You're viewing part of a thread.
You're probably just as quickly turned off by a legal-looking kid, when you learn their age, as I am.
The problem with being attracted to children, is being attracted to children. Not their child's physique. Children have immature minds, even as their bodies can look adult.
By your logic, finding underage people attractive is fine, if they look like adults, because you think it's about appearance, not how developed their minds are.
There are underage people who can be mistaken for adults, and there are adults who can be mistaken for underage. What matters, is what's in their heads.
And like the other guy said, it'd be pretty fucking sad to be a young-looking person if the only people wanting to sleep with you were creepy pedos. Luckily, that's not how it works.
For what it is worth, 碧しの (Shinto Aoi) was born in 1990. This set was shot in 2016. 碧しの was 25, it was before her birthday, when this set was shot.
Thanks.
Also, great post OP 👍
I have 2 bare minimum conditions for attractiveness:
-
Sentience, pretty low bar for humans.
-
The inability to cause permanent harm to either partner, especially as a result of one being underage, smaller, or deformed.
and btw, it is pretty fucking sad for those people whose body only attracts creepy pedos. I agree. That's the literal reality we live in. But you know what is even worse than that? It's beyond sad seeing people setting up a network for the distribution of child pornography and covering it with the thin veil of "our policy is only 18+ photos". If there is any statistical probability of those girls being underaged, and I think it's pretty damn high, then there is no place for such a community in civilized society.
You are deluded. Child porn? The person in the photo that set you off was 25 years old when it was taken.
I have no interest in actual children, and that is not mutually exclusive with my type being "short and flat-chested". The same way others can be into tall and muscular, and still not want to go for underage people who fit that description.
The people who frequent this community have no interest in actual kids. It's not a veil, we literally are not into children, hence the 18+ requirement.
OP linked the identity of the model to verify her age, "statistically" that's unlikely to misfire and allow actual CP. You're more likely to find that anonymously posted on gone wild.
Get off your high horse, no-one here is ok with hurting others, you've not found a den of secret pedos, but simply people who are into a certain body type in women. Legal, women.
If some pedos are around too, what do I care, better they look at these adults than actual child porn.
It's literally a community for women who look young. That's the entire description. You aren't interested in children and yet you're here defending the interest in children?
Nice job revealing you've not understood a word of what I've said.
If it's possible to be attracted to mature-looking people when they are legal, and not, when they happen to be mature-looking underage people... Then it's also possible to be attracted to a child-like physique, only when the person is an adult.
You have a seriusly distorted view of how different people can look despite being the same age. I'm trying to show you that you looking at a 25-year-old and feeling they are "too-young" has more to do with your sexual preferences than you not being into kids. People who are into 25-year-olds who in your opinion look underage, are still into 25-YEAR-OLDS, NOT KIDS.
A person can be into "child-like" without being into actual children. How hard is that to understand?
I'm going to admit straight up that I've severely discounted your credibility from the start.
A person can be into “child-like” without being into actual children. How hard is that to understand?
The part where you're simultaneously attracted to the way a child looks and also not attracted to the way a child looks.
Permanently Deleted
Of course you have.
In your mind you're talking to someone who "defends" or "makes excuses" for something you feel is wrong.
When really, I'm trying to show you that your preconceived notions started off untrue to begin with.
Of course you're fighting to understand what I'm saying through a layer of disbelief and self-imposed incomprehension.
Not to mention pride, which is likely to prevent you from admitting, (aside from privately to yourself) when your mind is changed by someone. This is especially the case when someone feels they are in the moral right.
And you're still missing the point. You can be attracted to a certain appearance, and then be turned off the instant you realize someone is a child, even if they are physically "up your alley".
There are underage people who get attention because they look legal, just as there adults who look underage. But only actual pedos would even want to go through with it, once they know, regardless of law.
Good people aren't turned on by a situation that would hurt someone.
Nobodies fighting to understand trash like you, mate.
And there's the pride... and strawman, you kept it together so long I honestly thought you were above such crutches.
I'm not sure you read half of what I had to say.
Maybe I repeated myself enough times that bits and pieces got through, so that in time, you'll put it together
And what a comeback... Understanding others, especially those you disagree with, is step one of interacting with the world in a way that actually makes a difference. No wonder you're rhetorically impotent.
You genuinely believe the only people girls like the one in the picture have a chance with, are disgusting creeps that given the chance would diddle a kid?
You honestly think it's not possible to be attracted to her, and also be a reasonable human being? Fully morally aware, and uninterested in doing harm? But being into small girls somehow means that capacity goes out the window?
What the fuck man.
I made a clear statement about physical attractiveness, not about their chances in life. Ugly dudes, fat chicks, and old people all get it done somehow.
Yeah, it's almost like who someone is, matters too. Like there's more to whether people want to sleep with each other, than appearance.
You know, such as having the mental maturity of an adult. Yeah, there are legal adults who are so mentally stunted they might as well be kids, but you'd have to be a grade-a asshole to take advantage of such a person.
Just the same way, what you're into physically, can't make a person desire actual kids.
And if you think there aren't people who are into ugly, fat and/or old... Boy, do I have news for you.
Are you sitting here telling me that you came to this community of pictures of underage looking girls because of their personality?
No. I came here specifically because they are legal adults, with a body type I like.
That you think that means actual children are somehow endangered, is your hangup, not mine. I can know that I don't feel anything for actual children. You, have to take my word for it. But for some ass-backwards reason, you refuse to.
Really this is just a case of you coming across someone else's taste in adult women and going "ew" because you have an emotional reaction to a problem that isn't there.
-