Secondly, by your very same logical chain, Capitalism is more authoritarian, as only the state and the Bourgeoisie call the shots, rather than democratic control.
This sentence doesn't make sense. Capitalism is an economic system. One can be capitalist and authoritarian, as is the case with fascism, or one can be totally and completely laissez-faire as a state policy in some sort of Objectivist hellstate. Liberal Democracy is what keeps those things from happening, as a competing system of government.
No, you're the one that is making precisely no sense.
For Socialism/Communism, you are positing that there must be an Authoritarian group deciding everything, and pretend that even if we accept your false, baseless claim that a group must decide everything, then you're still making the even more baseless claim that this group cannot be democratically controlled via liberal or other such democracy.
For Capitalism, you are pretending that the hierarchy and authoritarian structures inherent to that system don't actually matter. It doesn't matter in your eyes that production be authoritarian a la Capitalism or democratic a la Socialism/Communism, as the form of government takes priority over the economy.
None or your claims have any merit. You're full of it.
Let me get this straight: I point out very clearly why none of what you said makes any sense, and you refuse to acknowledge any of it and run, then say I'm the one doing the weird shit?
Why do you talk so much, if everything you say is wrong? Do you have a fetish?