Plane takes on Jira with open source project management tool for software teams | TechCrunch
Plane takes on Jira with open source project management tool for software teams | TechCrunch
Plane lands $4M for an open source project management platform for managing "issues, sprints, and product roadmaps with peace of mind."
You're viewing a single thread.
How are projects like this created?
This github repo is 6 months old, they already have 18+k stars and over 800 forks.
This looks like some overfunded pseudo-FOSS shit. Make the bare minimum open source and sell the rest to enterprises.
Why not take the money and really fund an existing project like kanboard or redmine?
I mean ffs kanboard is at least 10 years old and has less than 8k stars on github.
https://the-guild.dev/blog/judging-open-source-by-github-stars
On phone rn, but I'd love to see someone run the fake star checking project at projects like this.
I am on the phone too, but loaded it onto my server. It's currently running. We'll see.
Edit: So its legit? Wow...
Building trust report...ok Averages Score Trust Weighted contributions: 58743 A Private contributions: 1442 A Created issues: 24 A Commits authored: 410 B Repositories: 31 A Pull requests: 36 A Code reviews: 15 A Account age (days): 2689 A 5th percentile: 1 E 10th percentile: 61 A 15th percentile: 121 A 20th percentile: 281 A 25th percentile: 760 A 30th percentile: 1358 A 35th percentile: 1935 A 40th percentile: 3446 A 45th percentile: 4949 A 50th percentile: 7598 A 55th percentile: 10670 A 60th percentile: 13928 A 65th percentile: 19495 A 70th percentile: 23387 A 75th percentile: 40381 A 80th percentile: 57365 A 85th percentile: 84295 A 90th percentile: 113733 A 95th percentile: 233883 A Overall trust: A
they look ugly. plane looks like linear which is a win in my book
With $4M you could round the edges and then some.
I think that open source people should also be able to recognize that always sponsoring a new project is not the open source way.
They could have given established software a facelift and added a lot more features and this would have been better for the open source world than what they did.I mean it's not wrong what they did. They just shouldn't get as much praise for making it open source.
Imagine everyone creating their own versioning system because they don't like githubs frontend.I think we're thinking about it wrong. These aren't open source people looking to contribute to projects. These are product creators looking to reach the open source community. It's not the same mindset.
Oh, I do know that. But lots of folks even here don't and that is my problem with all that.
The FOSS community shouldn't praise them or companies like them simply for open sourcing the MVP of a new product.
That's a fair take
Imagine everyone creating their own versioning system because they don’t like githubs frontend.
I have no problem with that if they offer something new to the space
Yes, but the only thing they add is enterprise addons. We don't need more of those.