Skip Navigation

Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

408

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
408 comments
  • No, that wasn't the intention of your original reply. Makes no sense in the context of your original response. Just goalposts you've moved after the fact.

    • No, that wasn’t the intention of your original reply. Makes no sense in the context of your original response. Just goalposts you’ve moved after the fact.

      You're being intellectually dishonest. I explaned truthfully what my implied thoughts were, in detail, which justified the point I was making.

      You can't change them just because you want to win an Internet point.

      • No I'm not. Your explanations do not align with what you quoted and stated in your initial replies. They're poor attempts at retroactively making it seem like you were implying something you obviously weren't.

You've viewed 408 comments.