Toshiba developed a lithium battery that does not use cobalt and can charge 80% in 5 minutes. - Ev-riders
Toshiba developed a lithium battery that does not use cobalt and can charge 80% in 5 minutes. - Ev-riders
Toshiba developed a lithium battery that does not use cobalt and can charge 80% in 5 minutes. Toshiba announced that it had developed a lithium-ion battery that does not contain cobalt.
You're viewing a single thread.
the battery in question is only 1.5ah at 3 volts.
💀
it's a prototype pouch format, what are you even comparing it to? lead acid 12v? you're just seeing kinda small numbers and thinking that sucks, aren't you?
you know you get whatever voltage and amps out of batteries you want by wiring the cells together in parallel and series, right? right???
the point of this is the cobalt free and fast charging, which are both good.
small numbers? check it. see my username? i doubt you even know how each component works on your phone or computer's motherboard.
don't be trite, trying to correct me.
in the last 35 years on this earth. there has been Lead Acid, NiCad, NiMh, Lith-ion...scale up that new battery tech and then talk to me.
every 5 years they are jerking themselves off over new batteries. there is only so many elements in this world that you can charge electrically and have it not explode when the user drops their device.
bless your heart, sweet child.
🤣🤣🤣
I'm dead guys. Someone get this guy a job in middle management!
mango, did you have something to add to the discussion of battery tech or were you just going to do...that?
Man, you're a dumbass. Your username is the something anyone would learn about electronics within the first 5 goddamn minutes. If you want to insult the people you're replying to, you have to either start immediately at the top of the comment and carry the energy through, or bury it at the end. Piling multiple insults into one comment just comes off as desperate.
Also don't reply to people you think are dumb? I sure as hell won't be reading any response you have to this comment.
"uugugghhh youre all so dumb stupid dummy heads!!!!11!" proceeds to continue to engage with supposed "dumb" people
oh and i forgot. you're a dummy head...phew, almost didn't make it on time.
oh and i forgot. you're a dummy head...phew, almost didn't make it on time.
are you okay? did you need someone to talk to?
i have a good insurance plan, so if you wanted me to get you into a therapist i could.
Absolute 5th grader response, bless your soul lmfao
they said adding nothing of value to the discussion. thanks giga. absolute drivel. bless me? thats your best serve? nice
I'm not the one shouting about my username like its a phd
but you could be.
But why would i when it just makes you look like an idiot who thinks they are smart. If you truly had any experience with this, you would back it up with verified sources or evidence of your education or work in the field, but instead you choose to point to your username like its some badge of honor and not just a string of text that a database can use to identify your account.
also. how does it feel to die on the ant hill that is this article.? you type walls of text in admonishing fashion, but it sounds more like i struck a nerve. so let me make this abundantly clear. what's with the day old salt...its just you and me down here in this thread of endless bullshit replies.
i take it i triggered some kind of childhood trauma for you to cling so tightly to my pant leg. some people are just better than you in this world. i am one of them.
I'm just gonna leave it here after saying one last thing
Your the one dying on this hill, since you seem to be unable to accept you were wrong and since you seem to have no good counter arguments and are restoring to ad-hominum.about batteries? what was i wrong about? that's its not right around the corner? show me proof its going to be commercially available soon. since Y O U cannot seem to drop it. lets just go back and forth ad nausea.
you are really hung up about my user name. life must be hard always fighting the good internet fight, you make the internet proud my boy.
small numbers? check it. see my username? i doubt you even know how each component works on your phone or computer’s motherboard.
Oh my, a semi-apt username! Bow down everybody, an expert has arrived! Shower us with your knowledge, great holder of thought! Surely nobody else in the world compares to your mastery!
feel better now?
new shit takes time to make bud, this is a step in the process, but do go on with your useless cynical doomer shit.
oh and yeah there have been many types of battery chemistries, wtf is your point there? this is even just a tweak on an established chemistry; it's not even some bizarre new attempt.
yikes.
oh so you're familiar with putting in insulation before drywall?
me too. yikes. yeah it takes time. but telling us its around the corner is bs , live a little longer and you'll hear the same 'new tech' 'new battery' song and dance long enough.
I have been around long enough to remember when lead-acid and NiCD were the only viable rechargeable technologies.
I've lived to see the introduction of NiMH, LiPo, and LiFEPo. It's always cool when a new tech is developed to a production level.
I personally am curious about the latest in battery development because energy storage technology is one of the biggest limitations in a number of areas. It doesn't all pan out but occasionally it does. So I see no sense in bitterly assuming nothing ever will.
You're right. but at the same time. LiPo and LiFEPo are derived from the same 50 year old tech. tech article after tech article over the years touting the next big thing in batteries becomes disingenuous.
You're right. but at the same time. LiPo and LiFEPo are derived from the same 50 year old tech. tech article after tech article over the years touting the next big thing in batteries becomes disingenuous.
All large batteries are just smaller batteries wired in series for more voltage and parallel for more capacity. Both these numbers are reasonable and comparable to most battery tech.
According to Yasuhiro Harada, principal researcher at the Nanomaterials Research Laboratory at Toshiba Research and Development Center, “To implement this technology for automotive use, 50 Ah or 100 Ah is needed, and we need to increase the capacity to achieve this goal. “
This sounds like it's still not comparable to existing Li-ion.
The article is to short to draw conclusions from. For example their concern could be with temperature or with charging speed when linking many modules together.
yeah. but im not going to shake hands and cheer until i can buy it. anything before that is smoke up the butt
It’s a starting point at least
said half a dozen other battery projects that failed. i want battery tech to be better more than anyone else. but I'm not going to pat humanity on the back until this battery is commercially available.
And this is...what...bad?
This is obviously at a prototype stage.
They clearly state that this tech would need further improvements including significantly increased capacity. But that may only be a question of size as is the case with pretty much every other battery technology.
And they produce 3V max--so what? Lead acid cells' nominal voltage is 1.2V, lipo 3.7, Nickel is like 1.3V (I can't recall for sure). Want more voltage, wire cells in series, want more current and capacity, wire in parallel.
The battery tech has interesting, useful properties that offer some promise. I don't really see why you're shitting on it. They're not claiming this is some paradigm changing tech or anything.
Before condescendingly ask if I know anything about electronics or how my phone works, while I am admittedly weak on RF design, I have written drivers for accelerometers, gyros, magnetometers, UARTs, displays, GPS receivers, etc., I've done a little bit of work writing code for cameras, I've worked with ADCs, DACs, I have written code for PIC, AVR, ARM, RISC, etc. microcontrollers in C (also a bit of assembly and c++), and I have designed and sold a variety of circuit boards for hobby use using various microcontrollers, sensors, and other components.
I probably don't know how everything in my phone works but I probably have at least a working knowledge of 80-90% of it. I don't do electronics professionally but I've always enjoyed it. That's why, along with enjoying programming, I got my computer engineering degree back when 80386 and 68020 was the latest, greatest (lol) and why I still do electronics and robotics (the kids call it mechatronics now) as a hobby.
Anyway... I am curious to see if they're able to bring this new chemistry to the market in 5 years as they claim. It may not revolutionize anything but it could offer a nice alternative in a variety of applications.
Permanently Deleted