You're viewing a single thread.
Does it work on fish shell?
19 0 ReplyWhat that garble of symbols does, is that it defines and calls a function named
:
, which calls itself twice.The syntax for defining a function is different in Fish, so no, this particular garble will not work:
But it is, of course, possible to write a (much more readable) version that will work in Fish.
27 1 Replyyou can write a more readable version in any shell, it's intentionally unreadable
22 1 ReplyYeah, I meant, as an attacker, you couldn't come up with a similarly unreadable version.
At least, as far as I can tell, defining a function requires spelling out
function
and seems to require being defined on multiple lines, too.11 0 ReplyOh, I see. That's very nice then
3 0 Reply
Unfortunately it works in zsh. I just had to kill my laptop after curiosity got the better of me.
4 0 Reply
But it is, of course, possible to write a (much more readable) version that will work in Fish.
the gentleman hacker
4 0 ReplyThe ampersand looks very weird in that font. It would bug me.
2 0 ReplyIt hails back to the early days of the ampersand, from when it was basically still just Latin "et": https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trebuchet_MS_ampersand.svg
Personally, I do like this font (Fira Mono+Sans), because it still looks professional, without being so boring that I get depression from looking at it.
But yeah, that ampersand is pushing it a bit, as I'm not sure everyone else knows that's an ampersand...1 0 Reply
Permanently Deleted
6 0 ReplyPermanently Deleted
3 0 ReplyDoesn’t work in nushell, function syntax is different.
Probably still possible, just written differently.
1 0 Reply