Accurate?
Accurate?
Accurate?
You're viewing a single thread.
You can still run Arch & have a life. Arch actually just works if you use it correctly....
|>be me, 4 chinner
|>can't use Linux but wanna Seem cool
|>make fake and gay shit post about driver not |Working to justify using Windows
|>jerking it in the The shower while crying l8ter that day day
|>KEK lul
|>normies Suck don't they?
Someone's salty their PC doesn't run Windows 11
You've been training this skill of writing greentexts, it's very impressive.
Disclaimer: this is not a compliment
Just looked at your comment history and its just sad =(
Just looked at your comment history and its just sad =(
Wish I could say the same, but it was completely unreadable with all the spelling mistakes =(
Beta grammar republican christonationalist:
"Weh i can't read words weh don't Bully me ill cum :3"
Vs. Chad different Langusten auto correct user:
"They are real words you know not everyone uses burger units and Cafés about Sperling <(^^,)>"
Never had this problem, but I can see why someone probably could....
tfw nvidia
I mean the projector set up is probably using some ungodly proprietary wireless Protocol that only works on Windows 10.
Isn't it just a display you attach via VGA/HDMI/whatever?
Last projector I used had scart/rca lol
I run Debian on my work laptops, and Arch on my gaming rig. They are absolutely equal in terms of time sink, and it's not that bad at all.
Can totally agree. Debian & Arch are totally equal in terms of stability. Any Linux os can be unstable, it really all depends on how the user uses it....
Yeah, if it's unstable, they're probably holding it wrong
By Arch, do you use SteamOS on your gaming rig? And if not, what would be the determining factor?
I'll give SteamOS a shot when I get my Steamdeck. Until then, it's just vanilla Arch on my main machine until I've seen what it's like.