Bulletins and News Discussion from December 4th to December 10th, 2023 - The Legacy of Kissinger - COTW: Laos
Due to American cluster bombing campaigns advised by Kissinger during the Vietnam War to damage supply lines, over 2 million tonnes of ordinance were dropped on Laos over about a decade, averaging a planeload of bombs every 8 minutes. Laos is thus the most bombed country on the planet up to this point. 80 million bombs failed to explode - the cleanup operation is expected to take centuries, and 25,000 people have been killed and injured by bombs in the last 50 years. About 50 people are killed or injured every year to this day.
After the United States withdrew from Laos, the Pathet Lao took power and abolished the monarchy. Kaysone Phomvihane became a dominant figure in Laotian politics, keeping the course on Marxism-Leninism and implementing the first Five Year Plan in 1981. The second Five Year Plan in 1986 was modelled on Lenin's NEP, and this doubled rice production and significantly increased sugar production. After the fall of the USSR, Laos allowed a small capitalist class to exist, with similar control over them as in China. Laos maintains a 48-hour work week with paid sick leave, vacation time, and maternity leave, and workers are well-represented in trade unions. They faired relatively well during coronavirus from a social standpoint due to quick and efficient action to lock down the country, experiencing ~750 deaths out of a population of over 7 million.
There is hope even after utter destruction by genocidal oppressors.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Maduro invites Guyana and the oil company ExxonMobil to talk about Essequibo.
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was also invited to the meeting.
The presidents of Venezuela and Guyana will meet next week in St. Vincent and the Grenadines in the midst of high tensions due to a territorial dispute between both countries over the Essequibo, which has reached the United Nations Security Council.
The Prime Minister of the host country, Ralph Gonsalves, informed in a letter addressed to the Venezuelan President, Nicolás Maduro, and his Guyanese counterpart, Irfaan Ali, that the meeting will be held on December 14 at 10:00 am (14:00 GMT) in that Caribbean island.
"Given the events and circumstances regarding the territorial dispute (...) we have assessed, in the interest of all (...), the urgent need to defuse the conflict and institute a proper dialogue, face to face, between the presidents of Guyana and Venezuela," the text said. "Both (presidents) have shown themselves in favor of this position in the search for a peaceful coexistence."
The meeting is being promoted by the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), of which Gonsalves is president pro-tempore, and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM).
Earlier, in a communiqué, Caracas reported recent conversations of President Nicolás Maduro with Lula da Silva, as well as with the Prime Minister of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Ralph Gonsalves (who holds the Presidency of CELAC), and the Secretary General of the United Nations (UN), António Guterres.
Venezuela and Guyana have been disputing the Essequibo territory for more than a century, but tensions have soared since the National Government held a referendum last Sunday in which 95% of voters supported declaring Venezuela as the legitimate owner of the region, according to official results.
South American countries, as well as Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States called these days for a détente and a peaceful solution.
Venezuela maintains that the Essequibo is part of its territory, as it was in 1777, when it was a colony of Spain. It appeals to the Geneva agreement, signed in 1966, before Guyana's independence from the United Kingdom, which laid the foundations for a negotiated solution and annulled an award of 1899.
The dispute was reignited when in 2015 U.S. energy giant ExxonMobil discovered huge crude oil reserves in the area. Guyana, with 800,000 inhabitants, was left with estimated reserves of 11 billion barrels of crude, the highest per capita in the world.
With this potential, Venezuela began to insist on its demand and since last Sunday's referendum, President Maduro ordered the state oil company PDVSA to issue licenses to authorize the extraction of crude oil in the region.
Similarly, Maduro decreed that Tumeremo, a town in the state of Bolivar (southeast), bordering the disputed area, be the capital of the eventual state of Guayana Esequiba, and opened an office of the identification agency (Saime) so that the inhabitants of that region can claim their nationality and identity card.
Its weird to me that cuba hasnt been involved in the talks, they are an important nation that has defended the sovereity of both countries and both see them as an ally
Presumably, it would be incumbent on the leadership of both sides of the conflict to call upon and mutually agree on a mediator. Guyana won't call on Cuba because it is currently hoping that the US will support them in some capacity. Venezuela therefore has no reason to call on Cuba either. Brazil is just a better option. It's not toxic to either side and it's desiring of some sort of leadership role in the continent.