Starlink loses out on $886 million in rural broadband subsidies
Starlink loses out on $886 million in rural broadband subsidies
The FCC decided it wouldn’t be the “best” use of limited funds.
You're viewing part of a thread.
That's what this comment thread is about. Take a nap and reread it.
Seems more like a criticism of billionaires
If you don't like billionaires, tax them.
1 1 ReplyHow do I tax them
1 0 ReplyCapital gains, luxury sales taxes, taxes on property and holdings, those are all pretty basic and don't even require new taxes, just rate changes.
Then there's new taxes, things like progressive taxes based on value of unrealized gains (currently before SCOTUS), which could include stock ownership over X amount of stock, etc.
There are more ways to tax people than can be listed, realistically.
1 1 ReplyNo I mean how do I tax them. You told me to, lol
1 1 ReplyVote for people who will. Do you need me to teach you how America works or are you just intentionally being dense?
The point is the subsidy and the person are different policies. That you see them as the same is very Republican.
1 1 ReplyPermanently Deleted
1 1 ReplySaying true things does not make one an asshole.
You're just unhappy with the truth and taking it out on me.
1 1 ReplyNo, you are definitely mean. Your modlog shows that.
1 1 ReplyLol if you say so chief.
1 1 ReplyYou’re the one who got banned for bigotry, not me.
1 0 ReplyLol yeah the bigotry was support of Israel. Guess what? I still support Israel.
1 2 Reply
I’m definitely far from a republican. Pretty heavily on the left side of the spectrum, honey.
1 1 ReplyWeird that you share their values, then.
1 1 ReplyName the values then
1 0 ReplyOpposing subsidies that help poor people.
Seeing no differentiation between rich people and big companies.
1 1 ReplyRepublicans support oil subsidies tho
1 0 ReplySure, no one is a monolith.
1 1 Reply