Interesting that these uninformed takes don't consider that the underlying algorithms are similar, and that advancements in one area often transfer to others.
Piece by piece an artificial mind is being constructed, yet people who are not a part of the research and development process are complaining about which breakthroughs they believe should come first.
*E: Do you think down voting this fact will increase the speed at which chatgpt or midjourney are unreleased? This is just how progress is occuring.
skipping over the part where calling AI an algorithm is kind of weird, it seems very weird for you to expect every twitter post about AI is going to be completely serious and focused on the correct sequencing and rollout of neural network based solutions. this is just not a useful or relevant take.
Having watched the ai progression from 2000 to today, I think your belief that chatgpt and its ilk will be remotely represented in any artificial mind humanity produces is pretty ridiculous. Sure, it could be, or it could be tossed in the trash tomorrow when something better comes along. ai is not linear development.