Thank you for the news summaries...
Thank you for the news summaries...
Just wanted to drop a quick message in to say thank you to those who put in the news articles here... I was getting frustrated with the poor journalism across different mainstream news and really appreciate your efforts summarising everything here.
I felt like just a stat for websites like BBC news clicking up views to then guide them on what news stories to focus on publishing, and what to not publish... First world censorship at its finest. At least now I can just read the content here.
The autotldr bot also saves a lot of time from having to read extra non-value text that journalists pump in to make stories longer.
I do wonder what happens if feddituk is shutting down, hopefully this community and these news articles continue... I'd hate to have to actually go to the BBC news site again 😳
Thank you to you and all those growing Lemmy 🙏 2024... the year of everyone migrating to Lemmy.
You're viewing a single thread.
I felt like just a stat for websites like BBC news clicking up views to then guide them on what news stories to focus on publishing, and what to not publish… First world censorship at its finest
I don't quite understand what you are getting at here - could you unpack it a bit.
I think the gist is that OP feels like people visiting sites like BBC News are essentially providing the Marketing department at BBC News with view counts, which they'd use to help guide them on what to report on or suppress, and the visitors were incidentally fueling a sort of subtle censorship just by reading the news.
Although please feel free to correct me if I'm putting words in your mouth, OP!
That's right!
Hmmm,
I would say that every media outlet looks at ratings, newspaper/magazine sales, click-throughs to see what kind of stories, images, etc are popular and drive readership to shape future coverage. That’s not really censorship in any meaningful way. I only post stuff in the Fediverse that I think people will be interested in. I don’t think that means I’m self-censoring
I don't disagree with you, and I'd find it hard to comment on exactly how the digital marketing arm of the BBC works when it comes to view counts and how it affects their content, cos I just don't know. I was just clarifying for you what I thought OP meant.
I do agree that you're not self-censoring by choosing to post things you think people will be interested in, though!
Yeh, I took your comment in the spirit was intended. Didn't really mean to argue with you :)