Skip Navigation

Nikki Haley Marks “Roe’s” 51st Anniversary by Saying She’d Sign Nationwide Abortion Ban

truthout.org Nikki Haley Marks “Roe’s” 51st Anniversary by Saying She’d Sign Nationwide Abortion Ban

Polling shows a majority of Americans disagree with Haley's views on abortion rights.

Nikki Haley Marks “Roe’s” 51st Anniversary by Saying She’d Sign Nationwide Abortion Ban
142

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
142 comments
  • There is almost no way to convince people with radical opinions in a written discussion. So the push back is not really useful to challenge the opinion of op but of people less radical or neutral who are also reading the comment. But if the comment did not get any traction, there might be a downside in engaging by getting more attention to the comment. And you don't know which side of the argument people in the end will chose - so I would just leave it alone. If I'm not in mood for some flaming.

    • There is almost no way to convince people with radical opinions in a written discussion.

      That is an assumption, and not a fact.

      Also, pushing back sends a signal to others in the same Society that there are others that believe the same way as they do, and invites them to push back as well. A society self signals to the members inside of it as a method of forming the meta opinions of that Society.

      Hatred should always be pushed back against, no matter how effective the pushback ends up being, and regardless of the aggravation/cost of doing so.

      • That is an assumption, and not a fact.

        Sure, I would love to hear arguments against it. I personalty would prefer if it wasn't that way.

        Also, pushing back sends a signal to others in the same Society that there are others that believe the same way as they do, and invites them to push back as well.

        That is a fair point.

        Hatred should always be pushed back against, no matter how effective the pushback ends up being, and regardless of the aggravation/cost of doing so.

        Yeah, like I don't agree with this at all. Not difficult to for me to think of situations where just let it be is the best and ignore it is the best answer.

      • That is an assumption, and not a fact.

        Sure, I would love to hear arguments against it. I personalty would prefer if it wasn't that way.

        Also, pushing back sends a signal to others in the same Society that there are others that believe the same way as they do, and invites them to push back as well.

        That is a fair point.

        Hatred should always be pushed back against, no matter how effective the pushback ends up being, and regardless of the aggravation/cost of doing so.

        Yeah, like I don't agree with this at all. Not difficult to for me to think of situations where just let it be is the best and ignore it is the best answer.

        • That is an assumption, and not a fact.

          Sure, I would love to hear arguments against it. I personalty would prefer if it wasn’t that way.

          Well, your next part of your response (see below) actually signals that flexibility in changing of opinion does happen.

          Otherwise, my own personal life experiences is contrary to what you stated, as Groucho Marx once quoted, "I can believe you, or my lying eyes." I'm not going to doxx myself though, to prove that point, you'll have to just take my word for it.

          That is a fair point.

          It's an important point too.

          A lot of times we go through our individual lives seeing things around us as not the way we would want them to be, and wonder if we are the only one who feels that way. Seeing other members in our society believe the same way as we do is a positive uplift to our own lives.

          Hatred should always be pushed back against, no matter how effective the pushback ends up being, and regardless of the aggravation/cost of doing so.

          Yeah, like I don’t agree with this at all. Not difficult to for me to think of situations where just let it be is the best and ignore it is the best answer.

          The problem with that philosophy though is that you end up seeing everything as 'not worth it' because human nature is such that you don't want to be bothered to make the effort, and have to deal with the circumstances. Meanwhile, hatred continues to creep into our society more and more, as today's events avidly show.

          Sitting on the sidelines doesn't help fix anything. I'm not saying you have to throw yourself in the battle each and every time (tag-teaming is okay) but you should at the very least do so if the effort is minimal. Comment responding on an Internet forum is low effort (at least initially).

          • Well, your next part of your response (see below) actually signals that flexibility in changing of opinion does happen.

            Well, that depends if you view my opinion as radical. That was at least what I was talking about - not sure if it was clear or not.

            Otherwise, my own personal life experiences is contrary to what you stated, as Groucho Marx once quoted, “I can believe you, or my lying eyes.” I’m not going to doxx myself though, to prove that point, you’ll have to just take my word for it.

            Sure, we than have very different experiences when it comes to online, written debates. Which is absolutely possible - would be interesting to find out why.

            A lot of times we go through our individual lives seeing things around us as not the way we would want them to be, and wonder if we are the only one who feels that way. Seeing other members in our society believe the same way as we do is a positive uplift to our own lives.

            Fair point. That I personally tend to overlook since I'm rather a non conformist myself. But I can see how it's in general rather helpful.

            The problem with that philosophy though is that you end up seeing everything as ‘not worth it’ because human nature is such that you don’t want to be bothered to make the effort, and have to deal with the circumstances. Meanwhile, hatred continues to creep into our society more and more, as today’s events avidly show.

            I don't see how one necessary results in the other. I can run away if I'm alone at night and there are five Neonazis in front of me - no point in proving them wrong. Does not mean that I won't speak up when I think it's necessary.

            Comment responding on an Internet forum is low effort (at least initially).

            Sure, but also a very low form of any actual benefit. But than again, I won't pretend like I know an effective way of fighting against the rise of the modern right. So who am I to judge?

            • Comment responding on an Internet forum is low effort (at least initially).

              Sure, but also a very low form of any actual benefit.

              (Emphasis above is mine)

              It got us to talk, and share ideas/philosophies, didn't it? I'd say it had a benefit.

              Also, there are others who read and do not respond that it may affect, that you would never see the positive benefit of such an interaction of those others.

              And as I mentioned before, you don't do it for the rewards, you do it because it needs to be done. Hate should always be pushed back against.

You've viewed 142 comments.