politics @lemmy.world stopthatgirl7 @kbin.social 9 mo. ago

“I really do believe in IQ science”: Laura Loomer, Trump ally floated for a potential White House position, goes on wildly racist rant against Rep. Ilhan Omar

www.mediamatters.org “I really do believe in IQ science”: Laura Loomer, Trump ally floated for a potential White House position, goes on wildly racist rant against Rep. Ilhan Omar

Only months after Donald Trump Jr. floated Laura Loomer as a White House press secretary, Loomer used her platform on Rumble to launch into a half-hour long racist screed against Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Somalians living in America, birthright citizenship, and Muslims. Loomer begun the show by referring to Rep. Omar as a "black dog" whose "district is literally Somalia," and claimed that Omar's constituents are "breeding like rabbits.”

You're viewing a single thread.

60 comments

I also believe in IQ science.

Specifically the science showing that conservatives have low IQs.
- What the science actually suggests is this:
  
  Despite their important implications for interpersonal behaviors and relations, cognitive abilities have been largely ignored as explanations of prejudice. We proposed and tested mediation models in which lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice, an effect mediated through the endorsement of right-wing ideologies (social conservatism, right-wing authoritarianism) and low levels of contact with out-groups. In an analysis of two large-scale, nationally representative United Kingdom data sets (N = 15,874), we found that lower general intelligence (g) in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood, and this effect was largely mediated via conservative ideology. A secondary analysis of a U.S. data set confirmed a predictive effect of poor abstract-reasoning skills on antihomosexual prejudice, a relation partially mediated by both authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact. All analyses controlled for education and socioeconomic status. Our results suggest that cognitive abilities play a critical, albeit underappreciated, role in prejudice. Consequently, we recommend a heightened focus on cognitive ability in research on prejudice and a better integration of cognitive ability into prejudice models.
  
  Which is something plenty of conservatives lack the functional literacy to understand.
  
  Really interesting! Particularly that it's childhood intelligence, not adult, that determines later prejudice, suggesting that racist outlooks are deeply ingrained and set early in life. It's not clear if the second analysis considers contemporary reasoning skills, but I also suspect early and adult intelligence are highly correlated
  
  It’s also important to keep in mind that a lot of intelligence testing is meant for use on children. It’s a lot easier to gauge “how developed is your brain compared to what we expect at your age” than “how smart is this 25 year old”.
  
  I suppose it is possible that they only studied childhood intelligence in the study.
  
  ~~I'm curious if the intelligence tests somehow account for the quality of their education.~~ edit: it says yes right there in the abstract lol oops
- You really shouldn't. IQ is mostly bullshit, the only thing it measures accurately is how well you do in an IQ test.
  
  Exactly. An Amazonian hunter-gatherer might be a genius. He might be able to do all sorts of prodigy-level things if he were raised in a modern Western society. And maybe as it is, he's the best hunter-gatherer in his tribe because of how smart he is.
  
  But give him an IQ test (for the purposes of this thought experiment you're somehow able to do it despite him not knowing how to read) and he could very likely fail it simply because it is based on a Western view of the world for which he has no frame of reference.
  
  I once did a music video for a guy who was the most amazing country music fiddle player you would have ever seen. Like fantastic complex improvisations when he played. I don't even like much country and I was blown away. When we had him sign the contract, he could barely write his own name.
  
  Was he a genius or was he an idiot? Was his IQ high or low?
  
  for the purposes of this thought experiment you’re somehow able to do it despite him not knowing how to read
  
  Don't worry, there's plenty of precedent for giving IQ tests to people in languages they can't read and then judging them for doing badly at it!
  
  Was the guy's name Johnny and did he win a fiddle battle against the devil
  
  It was not and he did not, but he definitely played fiddle far better than Charlie Daniels.
  
  Every time I hear that song I think the devil played it better. ;-p
- The frustration that we feel over bigotry can be expressed in so many ways. We don’t need to rely on ableist slurs. Alternative phrases are more descriptive, and more accurate; unintelligence is not the prevailing problem with right wing extremists, for instance, nor is it the cause of their actions. Ignorance, prejudice, and disregard for the rights of others are.
  Conflating harmful actions with lack of intelligence does everyone a disservice. To suggest that “stupidity” that is what makes people act badly undermines any real accountability. The causes of problematic behavior rarely have anything to do with mental acuity, and we can’t properly address harmful behavior while being so reductive about its causes. Carelessness, bias, hatred, greed, closed-mindedness, indifference – these are the traits that lead to oppression. Our intelligence is not the issue so much as our sense of compassion and justice.
  A person can be unintelligent and still know right from wrong. There are people with cognitive disabilities who I respect a thousand times more than those who are supposedly more abled. They have stronger principles, seek to better themselves, and are committed to being good people. They are just capable of being sensitive and caring as everyone else. To imply that they aren’t is outrageous.
  
  source

You've viewed 60 comments.