Never mind they never went away, but they're gaining back ground. And they will not stop voluntarily.
Tweet by Laurie Penny ✔ @PennyRed:
Stop waiting for the 'real Nazis' to show up. They're here. White supremacy today doesn't look like the organised party system of the 20th century, because it doesn't need to. This is gig-economy fascism. Entrepreneurial white supremacy. Serving the interests of tyrants by proxy.
Greater income disparity than pre-revolution France. Pushing of gig culture and baiting people into financial ruin with short term incentives. And all people want to do is call each other fascist and nazi and white supremacist and bicker. Can't you see it's a distraction that's keeping you there? Nah, probably not.
I dont, and to my knowledge never said, that someone can only care about one. The problem is confusing cause and effect, and being unwitting pawns for the other side. Let me explain by using one of the examples in the OP, nazism:
Assume that gig economy is caused by nazism
Gig economy is a big problem, therefore nazism is a big problem
By chasing nazism everywhere and aggressively trying to stamp it out wherever gig economy is seen, we will fix gig economy
And you can replace nazism with any of the other causes mentioned, white supremacy, fascism, whatever.
This reasoning pattern isnt productive though. Even if nazism is a big problem where you live, fixing it wont solve gig economy, and chasing ghosts wherever you see gig economy just leads to conflict between our side of the class war.
I mean just look at this thread. Look how many people are just calling me names! This is how entrenched the problem is.
If you want to fix fascism, fix fascism. If you want to fix gig economy, fix gig economy. But if you want to fix gig economy, don't try to fix fascism, white supremacy, and nazism wherever you see gig economy.
A significant number of people can't see behind the literal meaning of words. Which is also why so much corpo or political speak is so effective, they almost always say "good" stuff literally but you have to see behnd those to what is actually meant.
No, people have explained that it's a metaphor, which is non-literal meaning. I'm saying that the guy you reply to is likely one that doesn't grasp that concept.
If you genuinely think they don't understand feel free to explain it to them further rather than expect others to waste their emotional labour instead of doing it yourself
Hey, chill out, friend :) I don't expect anything from you, I was just trying to say something relevant for everyone who's reading.
While I responded to your comment, I'm not really talking to you directly, rather just trying to add to the discussion. I didn't mean to cause you any grief, sorry.
Have you got a point? Because one isn't apparent.
The best I can gather is that you're a class reductionist who just doesn't express themselves very well?
They're not saying "the gig economy is fascist" here, it's a metaphor. You could argue that it's a slightly clumsy metaphor, I guess, but suggesting that white supremacy is organized differently today than it was in the 20th century isn't that far-fetched. The reference to gig economies is just illustrating sometime else (labor markets) that has very obviously reorganized in that same time frame.