White Rural Trump Supporters Are a Threat to Democracy
White Rural Trump Supporters Are a Threat to Democracy
A new book shows how many supposed “elitist stereotypes” of rural MAGA voters are true—and backed by hard data.
In the popular imagination of many Americans, particularly those on the left side of the political spectrum, the typical MAGA supporter is a rural resident who hates Black and Brown people, loathes liberals, loves gods and guns, believes in myriad conspiracy theories, has little faith in democracy, and is willing to use violence to achieve their goals, as thousands did on Jan. 6.
According to a new book, White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy, these aren’t hurtful, elitist stereotypes by Acela Corridor denizens and bubble-dwelling liberals… they’re facts.
The authors, Tom Schaller, a professor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, and Paul Waldman, a former columnist at The Washington Post, persuasively argue that most of the negative stereotypes liberals hold about rural Americans are actually true.
You're viewing a single thread.
I just love how if you don't vote Democrat, or you don't have liberal views, you're a "threat to democracy." I swear, if it was up to some of you, we'd be a one party system, with every single American thinking the EXACT same way...
Nah, I mean, I was around when George Bush was the guy. I didn't like him, I didn't feel he was a good leader, or fit for the office. I would try to convince people not to support him or the war(s) in the middle east. But he was not a threat to democracy. Except maybe through The Patriot Act...
There was a lot of things I didn't agree with that Mitt Romney believes. I think voting him in would have been regressive and bad for gay people, etc, who I care about. I think he is wrong about things. But he's not a threat to democracy. I belive that he believes the things he claims to believe, and that he believes in his heart that he's doing the right thing. I just disagree with him.
John McCain seemed like an honorable man. Again, I felt that his priorities and mine didn't line up, but he was nowhere near a threat to democracy.
The reason this dude is a threat to democracy is because he has openly and repeatedly disregarded voting and the function of government, which is kinda democracy's whole thing. If the votes don't count, and the results don't follow the will of the voters, then it's not a democratic system. If you systematically choose to make it so some segment of your citizens cannot vote, or their voices are not heard, then it's not a democratic system.
Didn't actually read the article did ya?
Hint: the article isn't saying all Republicans are a threat to democracy. It's saying that those who hold anti-democratic views--e.g. election denialism, supporting returning Trump to power by force, etc--are predominantly rural white Republicans.
Those are just facts. You can either accept those facts or join those folks in denying reality.
We both know the article is basically saying that one party is a threat, and the other can just do whatever they want. It's been like that forever now... Republicans= bad, Democrats= good.
Denialism it is, then! Very well, carry on.
No one is forcing R leadership to be morally bankrupt enablers of fascism.
R invited the bogeyman in because it was the only way they thought they could win. And now they have a problem.
-
We're not forgetting (meaning - all the rest of us who reject that shit) what the leadership pushed and what the rank and file voted for.
-
Not sure how they think they will back out of this. Two current examples:
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-fans-missouri-caucus-wellman/
https://newrepublic.com/post/179282/surprise-gops-favorite-gathering-full-nazis
-