How often had I overlooked women's contributions ?
How often had I overlooked women's contributions ?
One of the comments reads : Actually, we will probably never figure out, was it man or woman. but I thought this comment of the professor was an interesting eye opener. https://mastodonapp.uk/@MarkHoltom/112070436760917344
You're viewing a single thread.
Yeah, no way to know what gender someone had so we just pick one based on our twisted worldview where some gender must be better than other because reasons.
we just pick one based on our twisted worldview where some gender must be better than other because reasons.
The only one doing this here is you.
In which words did I choose which gender that inventor was?
well you seem upset that an archaeologist suggested it was likely a woman, so something made you mad
I am as upset with suggesting it was a man, as some may try to do.
Maybe my comment sounded weird with just the context of the post, but I wrote it also with other comments in mind.
Not sure why you got down voted because you are absolutely right
- we don't know
- society ascribes everything to the male
If we defaulted to "he or she (they probably)" then things would be better but we simply don't. It is always the man's contribution and it's disappointing
We should have a neologism for gender neutral version of "mankind" definitely.
I am just this one person always pushing a stick into an anthill every time gender is assumed out of preference and getting all the hate from both sides.Bruh relax
Lmfaooooo I can't believe you came and found me on another comment. You really do need to relax