Well, Boeing is demonstrably willing, even determined, to choose financial short term gain over any amount of human lives or reputation loss. It would be shocking if it was truly an accident that saved Boeing from a second day of testimony right when everything is starting to really fall apart for them, right?
Notice how you haven't offered up any evidence. Just motivation to kill him (even that's tenuous at best).
You know what Trump supporters often argue? That the "deep state" had motive to stop Trump from becoming POTUS, which is what makes their claims reasonable.
I don't disagree with you. But evidence of Boeing being willing to trade lives for profit is super, super easy to find right now. If you aren't being disingenuous I am willing to do some of the labor you are asking for
You are just justifying being suspicious. I'm suspicious too. You don't need to convince me of rhay.
But it's 100% possible for them to be willing to kill him but he still killed himself. Right now I've seen no evidence that they did it. It's all blind speculation.
t would be shocking if it was truly an accident that saved Boeing from a second day of testimony right when everything is starting to really fall apart for them, right?
Say it? No. But you certainly implied it.
I would personally place it at like a 60% likelihood.
Which is based on suspicion alone. That's my point.
I'm expecting random people on the Internet not to dog up evidence, but to accept that their suspicions are just that, and without evidence you can't call it likely the truth or pretend you know what happened.
Holy shit you just argued that basing your opinions on the facts, instead of your own prejudices, not only isn't critical thought, but letting people think for you.
I'd say it's more like a huge percentage of votes for one candidate got lost in a fire. Sure fires happen, but it was really important that this one should be protected from happening.