Skip Navigation

'Everyone in the World Needs to See This': Footage Shows IDF Drone Killing Gazans

www.commondreams.org 'Everyone in the World Needs to See This': Footage Shows IDF Drone Killing Gazans

"There is no way they could have been considered combatants," said one writer and analyst. "This is unreal."

'Everyone in the World Needs to See This': Footage Shows IDF Drone Killing Gazans

Adding to the mountain of evidence that Israel is engaged in a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip, Al Jazeera on Thursday aired footage of what the news outlet reported was an Israeli drone targeting four Palestinians in Khan Younis last month.

Those killed by the unmanned aerial vehicle in the rubble of the southern Gaza city appear to be unarmed teenagers or young men. According to a translation of the coverage, they were not identified in the reporting.

Tariq Kenney-Shawa, Al-Shabaka's U.S. policy fellow, said: "This is among the worst footage I've seen. Not only were these boys clearly unarmed and present no threat whatsoever, but they were struck multiple times even after stumbling/crawling away. There is no way they could have been considered combatants. This is unreal."

256

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
256 comments
  • I expect Israel to have a better justification for killing a group of people than "they looked Palestinian." - that's genocidal. This is a high-profile example largely because it appears so unambiguous. Israel are going to need to present the evidence that this was justified, or it gets thrown on the pile of killings amounting to that genocide.

    We have video footage of a bunch of civilians being targeted in a drone strike - until they're shown to be enemy combatants (not happening) this is evidence of a warcrime. Your logic could be used to justify nuking Tel Aviv - we can't know the entire population aren't enemy combatants, and it's not for us to prove or ask for proof, so stop worrying about it, Karen.

    If you believe the IDF need to prove the killing was justified, why are you defending them not doing so, and if you believe this is a genocide, why do you deny that the killings that make up that genocide are unjustified (remembering that they literally haven't been justified)?

    I'm pretty happy to change my tune on this instance if credible evidence is presented, but I'm also comfortable saying that I know that won't happen at this point.

    I don't think calling me a Karen for opposing warcrimes and genocide is having the desired effect, but you do you, champ.

    • I expect Israel to have a better justification for killing a group of people than "they looked Palestinian."

      Maybe they do, maybe they don't. It's not clear from the video.

      We have video footage of a bunch of civilians being targeted in a drone strike

      We don't. No evidence they are civilians. No evidence they are combatants. If you have proof other than "they look civilian", give us proof.

      this is evidence of a warcrime.

      It is not. No proof this is Gaza. No proof it's an IDF drone strike. No proof that it happened last week, last month, last year or last decade. If you have proof "IDK it looks like it", give us proof. And not just one of these things, but ALL.

      If you believe the IDF need to prove the killing was justified, why are you defending them not doing so,

      Nobody said IDF don't have proof. They just don't have to share it with the public, no matter how hard you want it. I'm not defending them, I'm trying to show you that your logic is flawed, and you can easily be swayed by misinformation and propaganda.

      and if you believe this is a genocide, why do you deny that the killings that make up that genocide are unjustified (remembering that they literally haven't been justified)?

      What I believe is my deduction from actual, confirmed, reputable sources. Not a random twitter video. My opinion that is a genocide is just that - opinion. And unlike you, I don't claim I have proof. Because none of us have.

      I don't think calling me a Karen for opposing warcrimes and genocide is having the desired effect, but you do you, champ.

      You're not opposing genocide. You're literrally sitting in your warm home, half a world away, reacting to random videos on the internet with an angry emoji for internet clout. "Genocide bad" is as useful as "Bad things are bad".

      You said I have bad reading comprehension and you deduced that I called you Karen because you "oppose warcrimes"? Holy shit, either read again, or read more.

You've viewed 256 comments.