Chad, a country in north-central Africa, borders a lot of active geopolitical areas - Niger to the West, Libya to the North, Sudan to the East - but is scarcely discussed itself. I'm not really knowledgable enough to give anything like a decent history, but the recent gist is that the country was ruled for three decades by Idriss Déby until he was killed in battle in 2021 while fighting northern rebels. Idriss was part of a few wars - such as the one against Gaddafi in Libya, and also the Second Congo War. While he was initially elected democratically in 1996 and 2001, he then eliminated term limits and just kept on going.
After his death, Chad has been ruled by his son, Mahamat Idriss Déby. In early May 2024, elections began which were meant to result in the transition from a military-ruled goverment to a civilian-ruled one. Needless to say, Mahamat won the election - with 61% of the vote. Both father and son have been on the side of the French and the US, whereas the opposition is against foreign colonizers and has attempted to put pressure on the government in numerous ways to achieve a more substantial independence. France maintains a troop presence in Chad, and it's something of a stronghold for them - when French troops were forced out of Niger, they retreated to Chad. However, it's not clear even to the people inside Chad what precisely the French are doing there. I mean, we know what their presence is really for - imperialism and election rigging - but in an official sense, they don't seem to be doing much to help the country materially. What is clear is that they like to intervene on behalf of the ruling regime and against rebels a whole lot - the most interventions by France in any African country, in fact.
The United States, so keen on human rights and democracy in so many places around the world like Russia, Iran, and China, have - for some strange reason! - decided for the last 30 years that they can live with a couple dictators and wars in the case of Chad. In fact, various American state propaganda firms like the ISW and Washington Post have warned the current government about the Wagner Group interfering with the country and spreading anti-Western sentiments as in the rest of the Sahel.
Things are very tough for Chad. They are among the poorest countries in Africa and host about one million people fleeing from nearby conflicts, which is a pretty large number when Chad has a population of about 17 million.
With the French Empire fading, they are beginning to run out of places to retreat to in Africa. Macron, in January, said that his defense council had decided to reduce troop presence in Gabon, Senegal, and the Côte d'Ivoire, though has maintained troop levels in Chad and Djibouti. Meanwhile, on the other side of the planet from France, anti-empire sentiments are boiling to the surface in New Caledonia/Kanaky, which is unfortunate for the French military as they really need that island, both for the massive nickel reserves, but also as an unsinkable aircraft carrier in the Pacific just in case a conflict with China pops off.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Chad! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Like I just fucking can't, how do these people even fucking believe this shit much less come up with it in their mind palaces.
US Navy Operations Specialist explains how a B-21 Raider loaded with a gazillion of air-to-air missiles could keep Chinese J-20 stealth fighters at bay
Just an FYI. There's only, to my knowledge at this time, only 1 flying B-21. And that was produced as one of those public proof-of-concept exhibitions after years of dumping money on the bonfire of vanities that is the military industrial complex. Who knows how long it will take them to even have enough for a single wing.
The Raider
The B-21 Raider will be a dual-capable penetrating strike stealth bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. The B-21 will form the backbone of the future Air Force bomber force consisting of B-21s and B-52s. Designed to operate in tomorrow’s high-end threat environment, the B-21 will play a critical role in ensuring America’s enduring airpower capability.
I wonder if "high-end threat environments" include rainy weather, something that apparently defeats and routes its predecessor the B-2.
The B-21 Raider will be a component of a larger family of systems for conventional Long Range Strike, including Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, electronic attack, communication and other capabilities. It will be nuclear capable and designed to accommodate manned or unmanned operations. Additionally, it will be able to employ a broad mix of stand-off and direct-attack munitions.
Yap yap yap the most it'll likely be used for is dick-waving the Russians and Chinese from a safe distance and maybe, if someone's unlucky enough, be used to bomb civilians who can't fight back.
Given its unique capabilities would it be possible to load a B-21 with air-to-air missiles and keep an entire air force at bay?
An exceptionally take I never thought I'd ever see in my lifetime. "Wot if one plane could hold off an entire country's airfleet by itself"
Well there's your first mistake. You're delving into the internet's morass of dumbasses.
I give you the B-21 Raider (below) paired with the F-35, which could be an awesome combination.
'Currently, the Chinese air force has a long-range missile called the PL-15, with a range of 120–190 miles. Some have called it an “AWACS Killer” because it can be loaded on the stealthy J-20 aircraft. Theoretically, J-20s might sneak past American fighters and launch on the AWACS or aerial tankers, removing vital force multipliers for the American side.
So back in like 2022 there's been quite a few encounters between the f-35 and J-20 out and around the south China sea, with a U.S PACOM airforce commander remarking that their AWACs were insufficient for detecting the J-20s effectively, which when read between the lines means there's a good chance that J-20s can indeed take down AWACS and tear holes into any airforce C4ISR networks.
Combine this with China's work in creating anti-stealth radar system countermeasures that have been reported to be capable of detecting F-22 decades back and how most likely this tech has continually been developed since then it would stand to reason that China's air defenses would be a tough nut to crack so as long as they maintain a regional defense strategy while utilizing the J-20s combined with KJ-500s as surgical implements to take out strategic assets and hamstring any attempted offensive air operations. Now you're probably feeling pretty thoughtful and introspective right now after reading this, so let me give you a heads up to prepare for some major whiplash of dipshittery.
B-21 with a gazillion AIM-260 missiles
‘So, why not load up a B-21 with a gazillion AIM-260 missiles. F-35s would scout ahead looking for any J-20s trying to slip past the fighter screen. J-20s are stealthy, but not as much as the F-35, and this would allow the F-35 to target the J-20 before they get close enough to launch. An F-35 pilot could request a launch from the B-21 and then take over control of the missile, directing it towards the inbound J-20.
Ever play the game battleship? Imagine a ten thousand by ten thousand peg board with the enemy team using "boats" that only take up 1 peg, and your plan is to try and sus them out like that. Fucking jackass
‘And even if a J-20 is able to launch, F-35s could direct the missiles to intercept the inbound PL-15s.’
The fuck do you mean "if"? Do you got magic hypersonic missiles that can hit the military airbase on mainland China from fuckknowswheresville outside of the PLA missile commands reach? If that's the case why the fuck do you need F-35s near by?
Jesus christ holy shit how high off your supply are you fuckers
Wicklund concludes;
Please you don't have to. I insist
Other than that, there’s no reason to expect holding off a large air force with just one aircraft. If it’s big enough it won’t be stealthy enough. If it’s stealthy enough it won’t have space for the fuel to have the necessary loiter time. But, having multiple aircraft teaming together, you could have similar effect.’
A message to everyone involved making this article.
look at the convoluted fantasy this guy comes up with to maintain western chauvinism in his mind. another sputnik moment is coming and americans are mentally unprepared
we're doing "epic NATO-trained Ukrainian supersoldier Ghost of Kyiv is able to take on 100 conscripted Russian orcs approaching in human waves all at once and only has to stop because he ran out of ammo" propaganda but with planes now
It's even funnier because there's, publicly known, more f-35s in existence than j-20s right now, the the question of who's likely to do the airplane human wave assault tactics statistically is more likely to be the u.s
So the core of this strategy simulation is... "Lets fly our AWACS close enough Chinese airspace for them to specifically fly their stealth craft directly towards them," and hope that you can shoot their planes down faster than they can figure out that their planes are being shot out of the sky by stealth craft.
Honestly it sounds like these dorks think they won't even need AWACS and will rely purely on F-35s playing hide and seek across the entire fucking ocean to stop Chinese planes from owning them
Holy shit, what a patriotic hero. For real, though, OS’s are universally fucking idiots who specialize in staring at radar screens for hours, sleeping in CIC, breaking their equipment, and fucking in fan rooms. Anyone relying on their opinion is an even bigger idiot.
I knew one who was on the ship’s VBSS (Visit Board Search and Seizure) team who described it as “basically the ship’s SEAL team” when all they did was harass Arab fishermen and sometimes give them water and fruit cups.
So, absolutely spot on. Although some were cool and just wanted to sleep on watch and get out ASAP.
Why the hell would you stick puddle pirate desk jockeys into boarding teams, don't tell me they volunteered so they can actually have something to try and actually be "proud" of instead of stealing Valor like all the other assholes
So, BUD/S (Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL) school has a notoriously high failure rate (second only to the nuclear power program in the Navy), mostly because it’s almost entirely physical and psychological abuse, but they don’t just let those who fail out get out of their contract. They generally send these guys out to the fleet as Undesignated Seamen.
On a modern steel ship, Seamen are primarily tasked with the hardest and least desirable work: removing paint (with pneumatic needle scalers and rotary sanders) and applying paint (harsh, oil based enamels), mending lines and wire ropes, hauling lines, standing incredibly boring watches (especially forward and aft lookout), and are subject to abuse as the lowliest rank (this also applies to Undesignated Firemen, who do similar work but in the engine rooms). Seamen are usually desperate to get out of that situation and into an easier job, and they commonly become OS’s.
All of this to say, lots of BUDS duds eventually become OS’s, but they enlisted with the intent of being war criminals on the elite death squad, so they volunteer for the VBSS teams because they think maybe, possibly, some day they might get to murder some innocent fisherman for the crime of being brown.
That sounds like it fucking sucks, thank the stars I had more common sense than to concider being anywhere near those fucking boats lmao. I already knew it fucking sucked for enlisted but being a paint scraper really sells it