Linux @lemmy.ml governorkeagan @lemdro.id 6 mo. ago

Gaming vs Regular Distros

TL;DR: Is there really a performance benefit to a gaming distro over a regular distro? Or is it more of a “this is the least work” to get setup?

——

I run EndeavourOS on my desktop and haven’t had any issues with performance. I just like playing with new things and learning from the experience.

I’ve seen loads of people recommending Bazzite as a gaming distro for various reasons. It’s gotten to the point that I installed it on a second SSD to do my own testing but I’d still like to see others perspective.

From my research, there doesn’t seem to be that much performance to be gained (generally speaking). I’ll be testing this on my own hardware but is this generally true?

I think a big draw (especially for new users) would be that these distros would require very minimal work to get up and running into a game.

I think the TL;DR at the top best describes my question. I’ve just been thinking about this and haven’t been sure how to express it in a clear manner for others to understand. Also, this video got me thinking more.

EDIT:

Glad to see that I’m not alone in my thinking. Biggest benefit of a “gaming distro” is the convenience of having everything setup and there is no real performance difference.

You're viewing a single thread.

38 comments

I'm going to say this in all Caps because I'm sick of this question:

THERE IS NO PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LINUX DISTRIBUTIONS. ITS ALL THE SAME PIECES ASIDE FROM HOW THE OS IS MANAGED AT THE PACKAGE LEVEL. DISTRO X WILL NEVER BE MORE PERFORMANT THAN Y IN ANY MEANINGFUL WAY.

I feel like I need to start a voice channel for people to just be told "no" at this point. There is literally no difference.
- Psh, that’s just because you don’t use Gentoo.
  
  Gentoo's benefits come from having software specifically compiled for your specific CPU, which can take advantage of its quirks. Technically that's achievable with other distros as well; it's just a lot more work when it isn't built into your package manager. You can also eke out additional performance by building a custom kernel and removing various features that are meant to protect against bugs or security concerns, and while Gentoo doesn't push custom kernels as hard as it did twenty years ago, the capability is still readily accessible.
  
  So: Gentoo makes it easier to access methods than can in theory be used to speed up any distro. The gains are either quite modest (for custom compilation) or not necessarily that good a tradeoff (disabling Spectre mitigations and other protections in the kernel). 🤷
  
  (Yes, I wrote a serious response to a joke post. Bite me.)
- THERE IS NO PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LINUX DISTRIBUTIONS
  
  tbh, I’ve always had that feeling but never had enough experience with Linux to be 100% certain.
- True, it's the desktop manager that can make a difference but you can install any DE on any distro.
- Phoronix many benchmarks proves the opposite. There is differences, even at the same Mesa/Kernel version.
  The difference between an hyper optimized distro, like Clear Linux (optimized for Intel CPUs), and more general ones (Ubuntu, Fedora) can be huge.
  Even between those general purposes distro, the technology choices (filesystem, scheduler, etc.) can make a considerable difference in some games/workloads.
  
  Please read what I said again, and don't confuse the situation. You're discussing performance differences of an overall system being benchmarked. I'm discussing gaming performance. No one distro will outperform another in any meaningful way. Don't start being pedantic and throwing around minor benchmark differences to be "that person".
  
  Pedantic? Say the person that immediately assume anyone with a different opinion than his is a morron and did not read his previous message ?
  
  Here is some gaming benchmark. It is from 2022, sure, but is still relevant today to illustrate that gaming performance on Linux isn't as easy as being the "same software with different configuration".
  
  And I could go on with other games, which had different results.
  
  There are many variables that can affect those performance. Obviously, the Kernel, Driver and Mesa version has a big influence, but so have some less obvious causes like the filesystem used, the compiler options used, or even the compiler itself. That's why those performances can vary so much in benchmarks.
  
  Hmmm Opensuse bros, we cant stop winning

You've viewed 38 comments.