You're viewing a single thread.
Waiting on OP to 'just stack rocks' to demonstrate just how easy and trivial it is to create huge monoliths that last thousands of years.
2 27 ReplyFirst of all, a monolith is a single rock, not stacked rocks. Hence the word mono.
Secondly, any carved rock, being a rock, is likely to last thousands of years.
What you're trying to say is that it is not easy nor is it trivial to stack rocks tightly like that. But it is both given enough time and manpower.
23 2 ReplyAttack the grammar, not the point.
I are still waiting for you to stack rock's and shows me how korrect you is.
Evan with bad grammar and sperling my point stands.
1 27 ReplySorry... are you saying that if I were a stonemason, I would be correct? As if that's some sort of job that hasn't existed since antiquity?
13 0 ReplyIn a roundabout way, I am.
You arrogantly claim that creating the pyramids was easy - a simple stacking of rocks. Perhaps if you had worked with stone you would understand how incorrect you are.
1 23 ReplyWhen did I mention the pyramids?
Are you under the impression that they're in Bosnia?
15 1 ReplyKeep attacking the wording of my replies rather than the content.
Still waiting on you to stack them rocks.
1 20 ReplyI mean, I've built a stone wall before...
11 0 ReplyWell in that case, your authority on
the pyramidsmonolithsancient stone megastructures is clearly unquestionable.1 21 ReplyOkay, you're confusing me again. You were challenging me because you thought I don't know anything about building a stone wall and when I told you I've built a stone wall before, that still means I don't know what I'm talking about? Then why did you make such a silly challenge?
12 0 ReplyBlah blah blah.
Yet to see you stacking rocks.
1 16 Reply
Ok your conversation is over.
2 1 ReplyOk?
1 0 ReplySmall mod on a small power trip. Keep deleting my messages like 48 hours after they are posted. That will surely add value to your life.
1 2 Reply