Skip Navigation

Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless people sleeping outside, even when shelter space is lacking

www.pbs.org Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless people sleeping outside, even when shelter space is lacking

The Oregon case decided Friday is the most significant to come before the high court in decades on the issue and comes as a rising number of people in the U.S. are without a permanent place to live.

Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless people sleeping outside, even when shelter space is lacking

The Oregon case decided Friday is the most significant to come before the high court in decades on the issue and comes as a rising number of people in the U.S. are without a permanent place to live.

123
BrainWorms @lemm.ee DeadWorld @lemm.ee
Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless people sleeping outside, even when shelter space is lacking

You're viewing a single thread.

123 comments
  • As I recall, Gavin Newsom has basically been pushing to look at available shelter space, and clear portions of encampments based on that available space. Problem has been, legally, CA couldn’t clear encampments unless it could demonstrate that it had beds for everyone. As a result, CA has a lot of unclaimed shelter beds. Some counties don’t have enough for everyone, but they do have enough to start moving large portions of people inside.

    That said, the conversations around this seem to miss one of the fundamental reasons why people are not excited take a shelter bed. Many shelters have been dirty, hostile, or down right unsafe. People have felt safer in tent communities where they could know and chose their neighbors.

    I’m of two minds on this. The all or nothing rule on shelter beds was weird, but shelters need to be safe, help people get care, let people keep belongings, and not kick people out every morning at the crack of dawn.

    • At least here in CA, the government seemed to be following the supreme court's previous ruling in good faith. I'd bet that they'll continue pursuing a similar course of action, just with one less technicality.

You've viewed 123 comments.