Bulletins and News Discussion from August 19th to August 25th, 2024 - Our Mountains, Our Treasures - Child of the Week: Hassan LargePenis
Image is a snapshot taken from the recent Hezbollah video "Our Mountains, Our Treasures", showcasing their extensive underground fortifications, supply lines, and weaponry.
iran can't keep doing this to me, they've gotta respond soon, right? I'm gonna run out of analysis about countries soon, oh god
The COTW (Child of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific child every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied children. If you've wanted to talk about the child or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any child.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Without a link it literally is just a poster on my communist forum. I don't think you're making it up, but without linked attribution it could absolutely be made up. If you're already looking at the source copying and pasting the text why in the world wouldn't you just copy and paste the link too???
So you're saying that a quote with direct attribution is substantially less credible than that plus a link to the telegram channel that broke it? Lol, I disagree.
Without linked attribution you are an anonymous poster on a communist forum. We all are. That's why I always directly link anything I post to the news mega, and why the vast majority of others do as well.
Which is all well and good, and I try to where possible. I provided links that corroborated after the fact. When I initially posted, I'm not even sure that there were any english language sources that published the statement.
I feel like you're just complaining about being too lazy to do a simple google search to verify some well-cited information instead of clicking a convenient link.
What the hell are you talking about? I've linked like 4 different sources at this point. Literally the second message I posted in this thread has 2 different news outlets reporting it. Here's the goddamn original link for your convenience, for the third time https://t.me/PalestineResist/53606
To demonstrate my point, here is the link to the original source of the information. It's definitely credible in my opinion, but perhaps you can see why I chose not to include it in my original post, since it's very inconvenient to view the source.
Great! Some people don't have telegram on their device. Which is why I promptly found and linked to a source to corroborate the information as soon as someone asked me to. And then posted even more links from different sources as more outlets reported on the statement. And then for some reason, you decided to skip past that and argue with me about providing the links that I already posted.