Skip Navigation
Conservative @lemm.ee Amoxtli @thelemmy.club

The Reason for the Electoral College

27

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
27 comments
  • I'm obviously aware of electors. They're selected by what you called a 'popularity contest'.

    A 'fair vote for president' is not really what I'd call the electoral college. Why would my vote count for more in Wyoming than Florida? It's not consistent either. Large states still have way more power, so I'm not sure what that's solving.

    Okay, glad we can agree on swing states. How could that change under the current system, though? I guess small population states are never going to be as popular for campaigning as places where you can go visit 20x the population in just one city.

    The left complains about this system because gives conservatives power disproportionate to their actual numbers, while we are still nominally a democracy. If there was anything like reasonable bipartisan legislative work, it might be better, but things have become so contentious. And yes, I don't expect to see it change because conservative states would have to choose to give up power.

    • They’re selected by what you called a ‘popularity contest’.

      Historically they didn't have to go off the popular vote. It is a check and balance that many states have abandoned.

      Why would my vote count for more in Wyoming than Florida?

      You are still missing who votes. You seem to think you vote, but it is really the state that votes. That is why your vote in Wyoming counts more.

      Large states still have way more power, so I’m not sure what that’s solving.

      but it is balanced by the other states. They don't have as much clout as they could.

      How could that change under the current system, though?

      I don't know that it can be changed in our current system but the swing states change over time. Florida use to be a swing state. Texas will become one in the next ten years or so. Maybe as early as after this election. THey went from a solid red to a light red.

      The left complains about this system because gives conservatives power disproportionate to their actual numbers,

      Not really. Since we are state based government, a popular vote would give to much power to blue states vs red states which are the majority of the country.

      • You are still missing who votes. You seem to think you vote, but it is really the state that votes.

        Uh... no, that's my point. If electors are selected by a popular vote, that's the vote. Very rare for electors to switch candidates.

        This states thing is a questionable proxy system. We are sort of, theoretically, a republic of states. Sure. However, it's a flawed system that isn't quite relevant to how the country has developed. It's silly to act like a system invented 250 years ago will always be the best or most effective. The founders of the country didn't expect for the systems to never change. They also didn't expect a party duopoly and hoped to avoid the current situation.

        Anyway, it's clearly not purely a 'states vote' situation since it votes are weighed by population. A pure one state, one vote situation would be like that. Texas Republicans recently had a brilliant idea like that where each county would have one vote, which is obviously absurdly anti-democratic - imagine 4 million people in Houston having the same vote as 72 people in some tiny county.

You've viewed 27 comments.