As long as the "driver" is responsible in case of a crash and not the manufacturer of the car, it will stay supervised no matter what the underlying tech is. "But your honour, I wasn't paying any attention, it was the autonomous car that drove over the kid" is not a valid defence.
Except it has been advertised as full self driving for about a decade now, and Elon Musk has even claimed it's safer than a human driver, because it doesn't lose concentration or attention.
That was exactly the point. There are quite a number of cars with actual self-driving technology, where the driver is not responsible. Or if there is no driver.
The thing that is ILLEGALLY called Full Self Driving!
Because it's not actually FSD, but ASSISTED something something driving.
Because calling it assisted full self driving is self contradictory, and should be illegal too.
That article screams "written by an AI". It repeats itself so much, it's like a kid trying to hit the 1k word requirement for an essay in high school English.