The Instant Pot Failed Because It Was a Good Product
The Instant Pot Failed Because It Was a Good Product
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16424/16424919d8f38cc78895eec1a3a0e2c168111529" alt=""
www.theatlantic.com The Instant Pot Failed Because It Was a Good Product
A one-hit wonder is never enough.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f9bf/1f9bf1d2f2b72f9b3ca731a0429d205133e6df70" alt="The Instant Pot Failed Because It Was a Good Product"
The Instant Pot Failed Because It Was a Good Product
A one-hit wonder is never enough.
You're viewing a single thread.
I appreciate that pressure cookers has the potential to reduce energy consumption by shortening the cooking time. Having said that, doesn't it seem a bit against the whole BIFL-movement to choose an electric pressure cooker rather than just a stovetop pressure cooker with far fewer possible points of failure? I'm sure the electric ones have a host of different features, but still... Simple stuff tend to last better.