Skip Navigation

Supreme Court Ethics Bill Passes Committee over 100% Republican Opposition

www.nytimes.com Senate Panel Approves Supreme Court Ethics Bill With Dim Prospects

Republicans accused Democrats of trying to undermine the court with the measure and vowed to block it from advancing in the Senate, making it highly unlikely to become law.

Senate Panel Approves Supreme Court Ethics Bill With Dim Prospects

Although I agree with this bill, the NYT calling it "strict new ethics rules" is a bit much. Reading the requirements in the bill itself, it struck me as legislating that SCOTUS justices do the bare ethical minimum required of most every other judge - in other words, it's the type of bill that shows up when an organization demonstrates that it is incapable of self-policing.

What's shocking is 100% opposition by Republicans to a bill requiring a Justice to recuse if a close family member receives a large gift from a litigant - literally, that's in the bill.

How is this controversial? Senator Graham says why - requiring the court to act ethically will "destroy" the court. He's saying, we don't care if justices are ethical so long as they're partisan.

Congress needs to step up here.

60

You're viewing a single thread.

60 comments
You've viewed 60 comments.