Skip Navigation

Signs of undeclared ChatGPT use in papers mounting

retractionwatch.com Signs of undeclared ChatGPT use in papers mounting

Guillaume Cabanac Last week, an environmental journal published a paper on the use of renewable energy in cleaning up contaminated land. To read it, you would have to pay 40 euros. But you still wo…

Signs of undeclared ChatGPT use in papers mounting
45

You're viewing a single thread.

45 comments
  • @floofloof They charge €40 for access, yet one is left wondering what sort of peer review this paper has undergone when obvious signs of generative AI has slipped in. What about less obvious signs? If the "authors" had simply used the copy-to-clipboard icon in chatgpt, they would have been all good and this would never have been uncovered.

    If anything, this is an argument for free public access to scientific papers. Any experts on AI could scan and detect this, even when it's more subtle.

You've viewed 45 comments.