Skip Navigation

Debating Antivaccine Cranks Debases Science and Harms the Public

www.scientificamerican.com Debating Antivaccine Cranks Debases Science and Harms the Public

Staged arguments with anti-vaccine cranks or other science deniers gets scientists nowhere. Trust me, I tried

Debating Antivaccine Cranks Debases Science and Harms the Public

"Far from showcasing science, false-balance debates allow evidence-free fringe ideas to leech vampirically off the respectability of well-established theories. Cigarette companies muddied the clear scientific consensus that smoking was harmful just this way. Faced with incontrovertible evidence of harm, they instead amplified fringe figures, encouraging debate to confound that messaging. One 1969 memo put it bluntly, stating that “doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the ‘body of fact’ that exists in the mind of the general public.” Cynical as this is, it is remarkably effective at crafting a public aura of doubt over science, the same practices adopted by fossil fuel companies today about climate change."

6

You're viewing a single thread.

6 comments
You've viewed 6 comments.