They use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.
They use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.
You're viewing a single thread.
332 comments
-
Any argument based on "us vs them" is flawed by default.
-
Yeah, like, who are "they"?
-
Nazis, terrorists and/or communists. In abstract, no definition or distinction. Just don't think about it too much.
"They" will fit one of these. But for sure, trust "us", because we're definitely not either of these.
-
I don't know many communist per se (mostly other flavor of leftists/marxists) but most of the folks around me hold wikipedia in high regards.
-
I definitely do. Wikipedia is amazing.
But. Unfortunately, everything is political: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN1642896020070816
My point wasn't even judging Wikipedia. I just think "us vs them" is a horrible framework for reasoning.
-
How is OP using that reasoning though I don't get it. Just by using the word 'They'?
-
It sparked from me wondering who's this "they" OP was referencing to. Pretty much impossible to pinpoint.
And then, I associated that with "us vs them" rhetoric lines. I didn't even accuse OP of anything.
I just wrote what that shower though made me think about. Maybe it was just another shower thought.
-
oh ok
-
Its showers all the way down man
-
-
-
-
-
It's a fucking shower thought you bitches
-
You got 1000 upvotes. At that scale everything is a political statement. 🎉
-
Brah, I was just happy that Wikipedia hasn't joined the enshitification train.
-
I agree wholeheartedly. :)
My commentary was an observation about "us vs them" way of reasoning, only.
I'm happy for your lemmy karma success!
-
-
-
-
-
-
332 comments