I'll also note for anyone who might be unaware that FGM is far worse than circumcision (which should ALSO be banned at childhood imo). FGM takes off a LOT more, it's a much more extreme procedure
I hear this often, and I fail to understand why anyone would need to defend male circumcision in the first place. Why must we continue to perform male circumcision and ban female circumcision? Couldn't both just be banned?
Even if they're both wrong, it's worth mentioning. It's much more common for people to have experience with one than the other. If you think "oh, it's just like circumcision so it isn't that bad" then you're getting the wrong idea.
Hey, how about we stop making one baby mutilation better or worse than the other. It’s fucking wrong, wrong to do it, wrong to justify it, wrong to downplay one over the other or at all, and wrong to compare them. Full stop. Just don’t. They’re both terrible.
What's your point? Other than one should be banned instead of/before the other? Because that's all I can glean from why you, or anyone else, would bother mentioning it.
Not to mention there’s nothing in the thread before the guy began making his argument that FGM is worse than male circumcision, about what is ‘better or worse’. The guy jumps out of no where to make the argument very specifically and ridiculously to downplay one over the other. They’re terrible. They’re barbaric. And they should stop, and arguing ‘one is worse than the other’ absolutely downplays the barbarism of the practice in general.
FGM can vary between the literal cutting off of the clitoris or just the labia, the latter would be more comparable to circumcision. And yes, both practices should be banned unless there's a medical reason for it. Anything else is just plastic surgery and should be decided by the then adult person.