You're viewing part of a thread.
Do you believe in justified massacres more broadly too? Would Sahrawis slaughtering Moroccan settlers or Kypriots killing Turkish settlers also be good things?
Mate, get it to your fucking head, a colonized people killing their colonizers IS ALWAYS BASED. now I know you fucking crackers in the west have an issue with that because almost the entirety of your modern civilization is based on colonialism and slavery, but you shouldn't cry when you're getting the business side of the gun aimed at you after LITERALLY TRYING TO STEAL LAND.
I think theres an active ongoing genocide, and the lives of the inhuman monsters doing it cannot be a concern if you want it to stop.
everything else has been tried and tried and tried. the only fix left is killing them until they can't. not until they promise to stop; they've shown their promises are worth less than nothing. until they can't. until there are no more veteran or military age "Israelis" who aren't crippled (i mean missing limbs, not bone spurs. 'cannot run or accurately fire a weapon by any stretch of the imagination' crippled) left to continue the genocide.
and then we, as a fucking world, need to do something token to making it up to the Palestinian people. start with returning every inch of their land, building them all the infrastructure bombs we bought have destroyed over the years, offering them free educations in every university in the world, and doing whatever the PTSD treatment equivalent of the fucking Berlin airlift is.
Who is the arbiter of when there is an "active ongoing genocide"? Who do you trust with the authority to kill and cripple entire populations? What happens when the Israelis are defenseless and the Palestinians come for revenge? Will that be a genocide? Should they be killed and crippled too?
prickly question, big question, but not relevent here: in this case, you dont need an arbiter; they all brag about doing it. they're not even hiding it anymore. lookupany Zionist shutzstaffel butcher's social media, you'll see video evidence, posted in public by the guilty party. their command structure says it. their prime minister says it. its in the songs they teach their vile spawn. they dont just deny it; they shout it from the mountaintops so loud it could damage my hearing.
the "Israeli" needs to be killed or crippled to stop them from killing Palestinians. at the end, there must be no such thing as an "Israeli".
what the Palestinians do to any "Israeli", or what they decide to do to these masses of non-persons on their land his nice it's returned is up to them, and I can make no moral judgment.
they could, as many likely will, jack themselves off about forgiveness, and make an effort to raise the remainder or ship them off to international relatives or something. I think that would be foolish, but its not my place to say.
they cod shackle them in cages and become the go to global spot for organ transplants, and I'd applaud their practicality.
they could dig a giant hole, and put every last one of them there, or grind them up for fucking fertilizer, and finally make that bullshit about 'making the desert bloom' ever so slightly true.
the point is I dont care. once you surrender your humanity, it is gone. you no longer count as human. the effort to kill you may not be worth it, but your deaths moral cost changes, irrevocably, to zero-or less.
Have you spared any thoughts to how easy it would be to swap "Israelis" and Palestinians in your rant?
yeah you'd just have to strip out all the justification and substance and reasons why.
If by a miracle the conflict calms down and then ends, how long will Israelis remain sub-human scum who deserve to be ground up into paste?
oh shit, we're grinding them into paste now?
well forever then, whether they deserve it or not; theres a global paste shortage. the needs of the many; you understand.