Beef produces 85 kg CO2e per kg of food. Tofu produces 2.9 kg CO2e per kg of food.
Beef produces 85 kg CO2e per kg of food. Tofu produces 2.9 kg CO2e per kg of food.
Greenhouse gas emissions are measured in kilograms of carbon dioxide-equivalents (CO₂eq) per kilogram of food.
You're viewing part of a thread.
the conclusion is "beef produces 85kg co2e". it's calculating exactly what I said.
the paper tries to quantify all the inputs and outputs for foods, but it fails to actually calculate either the actualy outputs (like non-food animal products), or the actual costs of the inputs (many of which would be waste products)
Emphasis mine, of course. The remaining four-fifths of your comment focussed entirely on inputs too. The paper does not do this and never intended or claimed to. It collates the work of other papers that did it. Why tell such an obvious lie? Your comment is literally right there
this is splitting hairs.
Is it fuck. You complained about their methodology and then went on to cite an example of a problematic methodology that they simply did not use. You have not read the paper.
I have and you are splitting hairs about this
Alright, point me to the page of the study or the line of the database that counts the full water usage of cottonseed in beef production. Should be easy for you.
you know as well as I do that the meta analysis is depending on studies that do exactly what I said, and relying on papers that employ a flawed methodology is, itself, a flawed methodology.
I already gave you an example of one of the papers it's relying on, and it clearly isn't doing that. Which ones are?
I'm on mobile rn. can you link the bibliography