Remote View
CW: Ableism on 196 :<
CW: Ableism on 196 :<
no mods are actually named is this ok to be here?
22 comments
-
Least bigoted anti-"tankie"
-
this and the chaser shit not getting banned are I think the strongest arguments for defederation. I hope our admins/mods communicate this to blahaj.
-
Have the Blahaj admins made any statements about why this is tolerated? I know Hexbear is almost uniquely vigilant but idk why they'd allow it.
-
I haven't seen anything and mods/admins who are in touch haven't commented, at least that I've seen.
-
I've seen an admin respond to the shitty DM leaking behaviour, but the admins don't seem interested in confronting the problem mainly.
-
-
This post is fine by general site rules
-
authoritarian lol
and his response to being asked to remove ableism and take down the DM leak:
-
What's 'authoritarian behaviour' on a message forum? The only way to do that is by banning people for saying things you don't like or for any other reason.
Personally, I think that's a fine use of authority when it's censoring reactionaries reactionarying. But then, I'm not a mod with that sort of power threatening to ban people for agreeing that I should use my power to ban others for threatening to use my power to ban them.
Would it be authoritarian behaviour to ask for or demand a change of rules to say that people shouldn't be banned for exhibiting authoritarian behaviour? Is this the type of confusion that libs live with on a daily basis? Now I can empathize. The poor fuckers.
-
its a joke because that mod, Moss, goes on anti-tankie authoritarian red fash rants yet uses her mod power authoritatively.
-
-
-
Oh hey, i saw that my comment got removed. I wondered what the reason was.
-
Well now what do we have here? Caught in the act and no gold to pay the fine
22 comments