Lemmy deletes your URL and replaces it with an image URL if you post a link then add a pic

lemmy.ohaa.xyz (Canada) An M&M vending machine error revealed facial recognition was used to illegally snoop on students (boycott Mars if you aren’t already!) - Pobierz

“Only because of that official investigation did Canadians learn that ‘over 5 million nonconsenting Canadians’ were scanned into Cadillac Fairview’s database”. Wow. This Wired article is contradictory. The spokesperson says: “an individual person cannot be identified using the technology in the mach...

(Canada) An M&M vending machine error revealed facial recognition was used to illegally snoop on students (boycott Mars if you aren’t already!) - Pobierz

This post was composed with a link to a Wired article:

https://lemmy.ohaa.xyz/post/1939209

Then in a separate step, the article was edited and an image was uploaded. The URL of the local image unexpectedly replaced the URL of the article. Luckily I noticed the problem before losing track of the article URL.

coffeeClean @infosec.pub

11mo ago

Lemmy deletes your URL and replaces it with an image URL if you post a link then add a pic

lemmy.ohaa.xyz /post/1939209

8 0

4 comments

Not really a bug. Arguably maybe confusing UI/UX, but the issue is more that you didn't understand what a post is and what attaching an image actually means – posts can only have links, so adding an image to a post just uploads the image to your instance, and then uses a link to it as the link in the post
- Yes, it really is a bug. Your explanation is indeed what I assumed was happening.
  But of course it’s still a #LemmyBug. Data loss is a bug. There was no dialog saying “is it okay to erase your existing article link and replace it with an image URL due to a technical limitation”?
  Arguably maybe confusing UI/UX,
  Confusion is an understatement. There is no confusion. Users rightfully expect an image upload (which involves no URL) to be non-destructive. In fact providing an URL to an image instead of an upload was not even an option, thus implying that the URL was taken (used for the article). You cannot blame this on the user as it violates the principle of least astonishment.
  It’s an implementation oversight, of course, because there is in fact no technical reason a post cannot have multiple pieces of information.
  
  Could maybe have a tabbed UI for a link post or an "image post". Both would essentially produce the same type of post but it'd possibly be less confusing?
  It’s an implementation oversight, of course, because there is in fact no technical reason a post cannot have multiple pieces of information.
  What does ActivePub say about this though? I honestly haven't looked into the protocol much at all (it seemed like a bit of a rabbit hole and everything's like RFCs and shit, ie. really technical and time-consuming to follow) so I don't know what sorts of limits it places on posts