Israeli soldiers who drove with wounded Palestinian tied to their vehicle 'violated orders', military says
Israeli soldiers who drove with wounded Palestinian tied to their vehicle 'violated orders', military says
Israeli soldiers tied a wounded Palestinian to their vehicle and drove him through the city of Jenin as Palestinians filmed the incident.
You're viewing a single thread.
I don't understand how it can be a "human shield". Why doesn't the other truck have a person attached? Why is he positioned in a way that protects very little? Why would they take their human shield to a hospital for treatment?
And, conversely, why are you guys using razor precision on this one incident when Hamas literally, and exclusively, uses human shields and actually targets civilians.
Please don't just say some dumb crap about "hurr it's never good for any side to do this" - please entertain the questions or don't even bother. Your side is as morally bankrupt as it is misinformed. If you feel like *downvoting
downloadingI'd appreciate a comment as well.Edit: typo
He is positioned the way he is due to the “slatted” design of the humvee grill. Because of that, you’d either have to have them down there or up on the actual hood. You don’t want a human shield squirming on the hood because the humvee sight lines are already bad so if you were the kind of war criminal that’s also practical, this would be where you would put them.
The rest of your questions are horrific. This one is too, but at least there’s an answer.
So everything I'm reading/seeing says there's some facts on this matter:
- The IDF said this was a suspected militant injured in a firefight
- The IDF gave this person to the Red Crescent
- Israel said they're "looking into this matter and will deal with this accordingly
The speculation is that they were using him as a human shield. I, and everyone else for that matter, don't know this for absolute certainty. We can both agree that this is a rather crude way of transporting an injured person at best or a deliberate war crime at worst. Your opinion about the placement is mere speculation and kind of stupid if I'm being honest.
I'll be back later to edit this comment when more facts come out and they charge (or not) this individual(s) with war crimes. I wish I could say the same about the other side and the people that support them.
Every time the facts come out, it's worse than the reality.
Everyone on the genoside jumped on the mutilated babies thing without a shred of proof with nary a comment when it was shown to be utter bullshit, but apparently an actual video showing a war crime doesn't constitute facts in some people's heads.
Let's be real the only side that's concerned about facts is Israel. There are people that make stupid claims and then are corrected oftentimes by Israel themselves. This is absolutely not true for Hams or any other militant group.
Please explain to me how this video is proof it's a war crime. Please provide the case document that explicitly states this IDFs intent. Why can't you just wait for more information instead of doing this dumb dance every time?
You're the only one doing a dumb dance by defending Israel in their land grab and genocide. And if I was a Palestinian in Gaza I'd damn sure be fighting against the IDF invading my land, raping my sisters and killing my children.
Dawg, Hamas raped and tortured people on Oct 7. They've been doing it before and since then but you think this is a one sided thing?
What land grab? Please don't start this without reading at least a little bit about the disputed territories. It's so boring to have to correct literally everyone.
Enlighten us please on what has to be corrected
Calling it a land grab is demonstrably false. Would you even care if I went into the history of the Palestinian territory since the late 1800's? Probably not. But I implore you to do some research - not only is it incredibly fascinating, you won't sound like a dumbass by saying things like land grab.
I didn't say it but it's really telling you didn't actually go into any actual details just using generic talking points
Did I say you said it? What's the point in mentioning that 🤣
What actual details? Like how Jordan or Egypt didn't give the Palestinians their own country? Or how Palestine was not considered a state until the 1980? Or how the Palestinians keep voting out political parties that want a two state solution and want to eradicate the Jews?
Why engage with you when it's just a free education on your part? I actually take time out of my day to read books on the matter from different authors from both sides of this issue. You just go nu-uh. It's so boring.
Please cite when Israel has cared about facts?
Ironically the 40 mutilated babies story. You're so uninformed it's actually making me sad.
On Wednesday, a spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told CNN that babies and toddlers were found with their “heads decapitated” in southern Israel after Hamas’ attack. By Thursday morning, an Israeli official told CNN the government had not confirmed claims of the beheadings.
So the disproven story they continue to use is proof they care about facts?
Please provide a source like I did. Don't just say dumb shit
That's what your source is even saying but sure
https://theintercept.com/2023/12/14/israel-biden-beheaded-babies-false/
https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/nov/21/israel-hamas-war-what-we-know-about-beheaded-babie/