Space.com poses the debate-provoking question whether SNW S2 overdid the gimmicks
Space.com poses the debate-provoking question whether SNW S2 overdid the gimmicks
With a "Lower Decks" crossover, a musical episode and lots of James T. Kirk, Captain Pike and his crew couldn't move for novelty episodes.
An interesting, deliberately thought provoking š¤ question for a lazy long weekend Sunday morningā¦
Setting aside whether specific fans like specific āgimmicksā (crossovers, musicals, bringing back Kirk or Khan) or tropes (transporter malfunctions), Space.com is posing the hypothesis that the proportion was too high in Strange New Worlds second season.
Thereās no arguing that the season was successful in drawing in large audiences week after week. Taking a look back though, was there too much trippy-Trek(TM) dessert and not enough of a meaty main course? YMMV surely.
For my part, I can both agree that trippy Trek is something Iāve been wanting more of, and that I would have welcomed 2 or 3 more episodes were more grounded or gave the opportunity to see more of Una as a leader and dug into Ortegas backstory.
The 90s shows seemed to be bit embarrassed by trippyness, although Voyager found its pretext allowed even stern Janeway to pronounce āWeird is our business.ā One can argue that the high proportion in SNW is a feature, not a bug.
Iād still prefer a 12-15 episode season though.
You're viewing a single thread.
I miss the 24 episode seasons
Me too. Even the more flawed episodes of a 24 episode season contribute valuable worldbuilding etc. Those shows became more than the sum of their individual episodes.
You felt like you lived on Voyager with them. You'll never feel that with SNW.
Iām up to the third season of TOS right now and it dawned on me the other day that Iāve already seen more TOS than I probably will ever see of SNW. I know theyāre putting more time/effort into SNW episodes, but itād be great to see some longer seasons.
Permanently Deleted