Infamous liberals

Conservapedia, like the incel wiki, are windows into parallel universes and both are proof, that ours isn’t the worst timeline after all.
- It almost looks like incredibly well done satire
  
  Poe's law.
- Damm, getting a sneak peak on what the enshitification o Wikipedia will be like.
  
  Would wikipedia even meet the requirements for that?
  
  Wikipedia is a volunteer run nonprofit with enough money to be stable. I donate from time to time, but it really isn’t susceptible to enshittification.

"Hitler was a socialist! It was in the name!" "China is communist! It's in the name!" "North korea is communist! It's in the name!"
"Kamala harris is a communist! She is with the democratic party, but that does not mean she is one. 🤡" "Trumps wouldbe-assassin was not a republican. He might be registered as such, but that does not suit my agenda 🤡." "Everything i read or hear, i see as fact or not based on what helps me most 🤡"
These people are absolute fucking clowns and it's impossible to talk or argue with them because they are not grounded in reality. It is exhausting.
- "Cheesecake is cake! It's in the name!"
  
  Cheesecake is not cake? Have i been living in a lie my entire life?
- Every word uttered by a conservative is deception or manipulation. Every word.
  
  Oh yeah. Then why kamala be dum?
  Stupid lib
- Could you imagine of Adolf Hitler named and said thjngs that were lies with the purpose of manipulating people and getting in power? Thankfully, we live in a timeline where he cant lie
- I can't imagine being a voting-age adult and not immediately understanding that these people are full of shit? You don't even need to know what specific words mean to see what they're doing. It's so fucking dumb and childish.
  
  I can’t imagine being a voting-age adult and not immediately understanding that these people are full of shit?
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead%E2%80%93crime_hypothesis
  Try huffing leaded car fumes for 20 years first. Then immerse yourself in Reagan-Era propaganda for the next 20. Finally, miss out on the biggest bull market in history because you put all your retirement savings in canned tuna and collectible gold coins like all your very wealthy online friends told you to.
  Now you're in your late 60s, your kids and grandkids never talk to you, you're scrapping by on Social Security after five years of killer inflation, and all you can do every day is sit in a dingy suburban ranch house watching "Mexican Muslims Have Caravaned The Border And Stolen Our Jobs" every waking hour.
  There's a Trump rally in town. All your friends are going. And the booze is free. Who are you voting for in November?
  
  There is a growing populace of people who actually believe the world is flat.
- Always create an in group and an out group, these labels aren't meant to be accurate for them, they don't care, they just want to have a word for those people there who we don't like and dehumanize them, if they could they'd just use the N word for everyone

Infamous liberal
Adolf Hitler
So...half the conservative base agrees with a librul?
- Their opinions on reality are not consistent. They will warp their minds into whatever twisted shape is required if they get to hurt the "other" (whoever that happens to be this cycle)
  
  Their opinions on reality are not consistent.
  I'm constantly reminded of that 90s (I think) country song. "You've Got to Stand for Something or You'll Fall for Anything."
  Many of them just keep falling for the next lie, even while the previous lies are being corrected. They never stop for a minute and think the place they are getting their info from is bad.
- No no no. This is Adolf Hitler [bad, because National Socialism Volkswagon Bailout Lost The War].
  You're thinking of Adolf Hitler [good, because Based Chad Hates Immigrants Retvrn To Tradition].
  Two totally different guys.

Hussein. 😪
They just love saying Obama's middle name like it's some kind of gotcha. What they don't seem to get is it doesn't mean anything unless you're a racist piece of shit.
- Barack Obama is clearly the cousin of Saddam Hussein, the 20th hijacker on 9/11.

"everyone I don't like is a liberal"
- I wonder why they put Hitler on the list then.
  
  They love pretending loke Hitler, the universal symbol for evil, was a socialist. They fuckin’ love fascism and everything he did but they have to pretend like what they’re doing is different.
  They also have no idea what “liberal” means, but that’s the case with most words exceeding six letters.
  
  He was a filthy painter, that's why. Now, if he had painted with a gun...
- Or a communist!

Hahah
- Largely written by and for right wing angry fundie home schoolers. You're not wrong.

Every single republican is also a liberal. It's the dominant ideology of capitalism and its state.
The difference is that the liberalism of republicans is more "classic" in that it's heavily mixed with racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, classism, etc.
- There's only two kinds of liberalism; economic, and social.
  
  Why do we separate the two? Who does that serve?
- When you say liberal, do you mean social liberalism or classical liberalism?
- Modern socialism is made up of people that get hard over the thought of leading a worker's revolution while being completely incapable of having a conversation with anyone in the working class.
  Like what's the goal in redefining terminology to be different from common usage? It's not enticing anyone in the working class to join your movement, that's for sure. Most people don't even understand what the hell the average socialist is even talking about at this point.
  
  I agree we can get up our own asses with the terminology, but in this case just skimming the Wikipedia page will reveal that the concept of liberalism encompasses almost all dominant political parties' philosophies.

even they should know the difference between librul and commie, right?
- They literally don't
- No, liberal, commie, fascist, are all just interchangeable terms for "people I don't like"
- The people who curate the site? Absolutely. The people who frequent the site...? ehhhh
  
  The people who curate the site are out of their damn minds

Hitler was just really passionate about giving free healthcare to Jews, LGBT, intellectuals, Romani, slightly swarthy people, etc etc.
- Free hair cuts, de-licing and showers too.
  
  And they all got a unique free tatoo!
- If i didn't know any better I'd say that was sarcasm :o
  Clearly I'm misinformed on Hitler tho and they're definitelyNOT labeling him with their no-no word in order to pretend they aren't fuckin Nazis themselves.

Gotta make sure to include the Hussein in Obama's name
- Can't last let us forget that he's probably related to Saddam somehow.

Have they listened to Bill Maher lately? I don't think he's liberal anymore.
- I think he is, unfortunately. he's just mask-off about it.
  
  Is...liberal? Or do you mean neoliberal?
- Liberals don’t run around scared and clutching their pearls all the time, you get more views if you sell rage and fear. Conservatives love to be angry and scared all the time.

I wouldn't be surprised if somewhere in the terms of use for that wiki that they clarify that they are not liable for any trust users put in the articles and the tagline "trustworthy encyclopedia" cannot be enforced

How is this list organized? It seems like they randomly wrote names down as it came to them.
- It's a Wiki, so you can just pop in and add a bullet point however you like, assuming you have an account.
  This probably was crafted by a small pool of die-hards who dropped a name on the list any time they found out someone existed who made them mad.
  
  It's specifically Conservapedia. They once tried to make their own translation of the Bible because they thought existing ones were too liberal.
  https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia:The_Conservative_Bible_Project
  Edit: almost forgot. The guy who runs it is the son of anti-feminist Phyllis Schlafly.

Stalin was totally a lib tho
"We can't do communism, we have to keep the state and enact a series of slow reforms. Also jail all the gays"
- Eh, I dunno that I'd actually characterize him as a liberal so much as him being an authoritarian that just pushed whatever happened to serve him at any point. Kinda in the same vein of fascists not having any economic ideology, just whatever serves their ideal of the state at any given moment. So yeah, I certainly agree with your sentiment that Stalin certainly was not a communist, but more because he only cared about gaining/maintaining power rather than actually subscribing to any economic theory.
  
  Stalin was by most accounts a true believer in Marxism-Leninism. There are simply too many unforced ideological-caused errors for it to be anything else, like Lysenkoism rejecting Mendelian genetics because the fascists loved it and it raised questions of eugenics.
  The Stalinist economic plans were thoroughly Marxist. The problem there (as far as Stalin's true believer status is concerned) was not ideological.
  He was just a drunk, paranoid, murderous asshole. Socialists simply don't like admitting that they're as vulnerable to hypocrisy and corruption as anyone else.

Not PZ Myers! D:
- I can't believe they spelled his name right for once.

They have an article on quantum mechanics
- Was not expecting the abrupt pivot into barely relevant bible study.
  
  It's an internet encyclopedia built for and by conservatives. Literally everything on there abruptly pivots to barely relevant Bible study.
  
  In order to understand it you have to understand its creator: Andrew Schlafly: he’s an electrical engineer and lawyer and his mother is Phyllis Schlafly, a lawyer famous for her militant opposition to feminism and the Equal Rights Amendment, a proposed amendment to the constitution that reads:
  Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
  Phyllis wasn’t just some opponent of that amendment, no she was probably the primary reason it failed.
  In short: there’s no reason why that website should be in any way sane just as there’s no reason its founder should be in any way sane. He really likes to critique physics theories that he doesn’t understand by citing philosophy and theology.
  
  Several parables in the Bible foreshadow the insight of quantum entanglement about paired photons having opposite spin
  Interesting, I wonder what their evidence is for that-
  by contrasting two men in their relationship with God. The Prodigal Son contrasts two brothers, two churchgoers are contrasted in Luke 18:9–14 , and two brothers are further contrasted in Luke 21:28-31
  Just... 2 people being compared?
  LOL

You just gotta love how Richard Dawkins comes before Hitler, Stalin, and Mao...
"Yeah the guy brings facts to the table, can't have that, that's the worst, that's like worse than Hitler, man!"
- Richard Dawkins disagrees with their little coloring book.
- I thought Dawkins was a weird one put up there. He's a genius. Not even political.
- well, just as bad as. these guys definitely hate sanger and mao worse than hitler, and they're both lower.
- fuck Dawkins too
  
  Because? You're one of those guys who use the pinnacle of science in their hands to tell people about their dislike of actual scientists?

Richard Dawkins... Ahahahaha! Dude is BFF of conservative right winger Ayaan Hirsi Ali!

Don't forget: Satan is a Leftist

If you call yourself a "conservative" you're either a fascist or a liberal that just isn't quite there yet.

Why do they list Hitler as their enemy, when their own selected Führer obviously idols him?

Thisis why you never trust wikipedia
- It's from conservapedia!
  
  still a wiki
- But it's Conservapedia. And it says it's "Trustworthy" under the logo.