Brian Molko criticised Giorgia Meloni during a concert at the Sonic Park festival
Meloni heads Italy’s most rightwing government since the second world war. Italy’s criminal code punishes with a fine ranging from €1,000 to €5,000 anyone who “publicly defames the republic”, which includes the government, parliament, the courts and the army.
I'm 100% Meloni. She is doing all the right things. These bitch ass "artists" are too out of touch and arrogant to understand any of the issues people face and they're too rich to actually feel the consequences of these brain dead virtue signaling mantras. Fuck Placebo
There's anti-art hate spewed by the right, it surprised me too but its there. A lot of them usually start their rants with "art isn't political" or "art has no value except monetary" and go from there
Imagine being so devoid of any sort of substance that you literally have to go through somebody's profile on a semi anonymous forum and search for literally anything to bring as an ad hom to cover your inability to actually provide a genuine criticism. It's sad. You should honestly be careful because you might just OD on all that copium.
You're a complete retard. This is a semi anonymous decentralized forum. Everything stated on here stands for itself on its own merits. I'm not going to use my Bachelor's in CS to make myself any more "qualified", and neither is anybody on here. The fact that you think there's any sort of qualifications for opinions on a place like lemmy just shows how shallow your mindset is. The reality is that you're just looking for any excuse to dismiss or shut down what I said without feeling like a complete idiot for not being able to provide a rebuttal. You're trying to shield your ignorance with arrogance by pretending that you're "qualified" by having the "right opinions". If you have to resort to do something as desperate and intellectually lazy as digging through someone's profile to provide an ad hom as a replacement for any substance then you already lost. It shows that you have nothing whatsoever.
I don't have a disdain for ad homs if they actually come attached with something. Whether it's an argument, explanation, rebuttal, literally anything. But if the ad hom is used as a replacement for substance then is it meaningless and fallacious, but also shows a great deal of intellectual laziness.
You probably think this is a galaxy brain gotcha, when in reality it just shows you're incapable of comprehend the concept of context. I gave an opinion. You can either agree or disagree. If you disagree then either state that you disagree and leave or explain your disagreement. Leaving ad hom and pretending it's an explanation is literally the textbook example of why this fallacy is a fallacy. It doesn't make you any less wrong or me any less right. It just showcases your inability to actually rebuttal what was said. With that being said, if some moron is clearly engaging in bad faith,, then there's nothing for me to explain. There's literally no argument for me to counter, therfore, these morons just get a reflection of their engagement
Standard or not (which I checked in Canada it varies by province), it's still a step backwards and creates unnecessary stress for already existing family units. That's not even including the extra paperwork, time, and money spent by all parties involved just to fix a parental rights issue that didn't exist. So how is this an issue that effects the people other than negatively?
I agree that it shouldn't affect existing family units, but at the same time this isn't anything unusual. The non biological parent has to go through the normal adoption process to be considered a legal guardian. The same thing should apply to heterosexual couples where one, or both, of the parents aren't the biological parents of the children.
We'll have to agree to disagree on whether something is the right thing to do if it's considered the standard.
I understand where you're coming from and there could be a lot of scenarios where adoption is a good option but at the end of the day homosexual couples don't necessarily have the chance of both being biological parents like heterosexual couples do. What you're describing is equality, but I would argue that it's also discriminatory.