Outdated snap packages - Issues Canonical Needs to Address Before Releasing an "All Snap" Desktop

Pop is a better Ubuntu than Ubuntu now IMO.

I really hope the Cosmic desktop turns out to be awesome, that could really set them apart if it works.

I'll also put in a vote for Debian Stable as a desktop distro in 2023. Flatpaks have drastically increased Debian Stable's appeal for home users, and you can now comfortably run a real stable distro while having the ~dozen applications you actually care about stay up to date. If you need more than Flatpaks there's also Homebrew, Nix, Cargo, deb-get, etc.

Pure Debian is fine, if you have a decent grasp of Linux, and don't want to install two applications with conflicting dependencies.

If Ubuntu wants to go all-in on snaps, I expect them to do the same amount of vetting, testing, and maintenance that they do in the official Ubuntu repos.

But I think the real point here is to save themselves that work. The current Snap store is a mess, with multiple versions of the same apps by different packagers/maintainers. If upstream protects adopted snaps and provided official distro-agnostic packages, then that'd be cool, but that's not what I'm seeing today, by and large.

My general experience with Snaps has been poor. I don't know if Snaps are there future, but I know for damn sure that they're not the present and I'm not motivated to go any further into the Snap ecosystem until they clean up this mess

Are snaps still slow as heck and use up memory per install for no reason?

Bingo.

Near 20 year Ubuntu user here, I'm on the lookout for something different. Probably debian, but I want KDE

I bounced to mint cinnamon as soon as this was announced. I miiggghhhtttt switch to arch as cinnamon hasn't quite made me feel like I'm able to do what I want, but I plan to at least try LMDE before that

NixOS. I'm going to migrate to NixOS by then.

Hopefully Debian or LMDE. Canonical is becoming a mini-Microsoft.

The idea is you package the software once and it works forever, because all dependencies for it are provided in the exact right version. And the dependencies may include things that would not be included in the base system (like super new versions of some important libraries).

That is true, but that is also the problem: both the package and all its dependencies may be left never updated.

In traditional Linux distribution, like Debian, every package must be compiled within the same system, which usually means specific version of all key libraries. And when the key libraries are upgraded some packages compiled for older versions won't work, the package might not even compile with newer version of the libraries. And it is often not possible/practical to provide multiple different version of libraries (or other shared system components). The result is distribution developers have a lot of hard work updating all the packages. When there is no one to fix a package for the next version of the package, the package will be removed from the distribution. That happens when package is not maintained upstream and/or no one cares enough to maintain it in the distribution. In that case – is it worth to keep it?

Snap makes packaging applications much easier, and more decoupled from the operating system 'core'. Less maintenance is needed… but that also means less maintenance will be done, which is not necessarily good.

On the other hand, Snap allows application to be maintained more rapidly than the distro core – in that case it can make things safer – fix in applications and their dependencies can be fixed that it could be done in the normal Debian release process. But that depends on maintainers of the specific snap and its dependencies.

Security. You run apps in a confined, sandboxed environment and choose what they have access to on the host system. This is particularly important for third-party apps. It's much safer than installing some random deb you found on the web or adding a third-party PPA.

I'd like to like Snaps, but the main thing that put me off them was their inability to see: • Fonts • Printers/Scanners • Other Internal Hard Drives (other than Home) • Cameras • USB Sticks • Anything in system folders • Other software, or plugins

This was when they were a pretty new thing though - so, fingers crossed, have they managed to deal with this permissions thing yet? Something like Flatseal, or Android's "This program would like to access this folder and your camera - Allow/Deny"?

Please for the love, hate, indifference, or whatever of god switch to Endeavor OS. I try not to criticize people’s distro choice but Manjaro is Endeavor OS with more bugs. If you have some reason that you can’t switch that’s fine, but if you can, please try Endeavor.

Why not endeavor? Manjaro holds back packages from the Arch upstream so if you install a newer package from the AUR it can possibly depend on packages Manjaro held back and break your install.