You're not getting out of the plane
You're not getting out of the plane
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a15baa3c-2411-49e6-8b14-9d25f5e13c84.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a15baa3c-2411-49e6-8b14-9d25f5e13c84.jpeg?format=webp)
Google's ai confused G's (force of gravity) with grams
You're not getting out of the plane
Google's ai confused G's (force of gravity) with grams
You're viewing a single thread.
It's not confused. That implies it understands what it wrote. The probability of g meaning grams must be higher than the force of gravity, even with the context. So grams was included in the generation of predicted text. Maybe it's because g and G are both often used for gravity, where grams is always lower case.
Usually, g is used to represent acceleration due to gravity, whereas G is used to represent the gravitational constant in the calculation of the gravitational attraction between any two bodies.
G-force is used a lot. You are right if you look at it from what it's being used for, but again LLMs are about statistical occurrences, and g/G is a good example of how the numbers in millions of data points may not match up to proper use.
G-spot is also used, and I'm disappointed the AI didn't hallucinate that into this response.
An AI that's retrained/jailbroken might be more apt to go that direction.